My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04014
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:53:16 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:05:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.766
Description
Gunnison River General Publications - Correspondence - Reports - Etc
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
3/1/1993
Author
Unknown
Title
Scoping Report for the Gunnison River Contract - Analysis Notebook - Public Scoping Comments - Appendices
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />if,f~}i <br /> <br />:~>>'; <br />1.1.-._::':_,;,:: <br />"'{:',<:'::- <br /> <br /> <br />IEll755 <br /> <br />I <br />,', <br />i <br /> <br />Public Scoping Comments, Gunnison River Contract, cont. <br /> <br />!~ ,. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />2.1. <br /> <br />09. <br /> <br />Further study effects of timing of rel....es upon Upper Basin priorities. <br /> <br />2,2. 05. What is cost of improvements- <br />-to Blue Mesa. users/uses <br />-to upstream users/uses <br />(i.e., cost of improving ecosystem through maintaining more natural streamflows, ref. 2.2.3) <br /> <br />2.2. 08. Suggest looking at pre-Aspinall environmental issues that were conSidered <br />when Aspinall being planned. <br /> <br />2.2, 13. You cbanged river into Blue Mesa (Reservoir) without adequate information. <br />Be careful and underslBnd' changes you are proposing, <br /> <br />2.2, <br /> <br />Find and use existing "tudies. <br /> <br />14. <br /> <br />3. 01. Study needed to determine costs, to taxpayers and Federal government, of <br />hydropower losses for alternatives. <br /> <br />3. 10. UnderslBnd that rel....es will hurt Gold Medal fishery? Are studies needed? <br />What is economic cost? <br /> <br />3. 15. Flushing flows - study needed to determine sediment problems now and <br />before Aspinall? Do Monument and Gorge have the same needs? What frequency and <br />duration of flushing is needed. Does flushing Monument hurt Gorge and downstream. <br /> <br />3, 17. Using snowpack predictions -- if you underestimate runoff and store water for <br />"spring high flow," you can cause floods. Has prediction capability improved? Need accurate <br />prediction to protect from floods. <br /> <br />3. 18. WAPA EIS on power alternatives -- how does this relate to contract? Can <br />we use W APA data? Will they answer some questions? <br /> <br />3. 24. b. -What is response to endangered 'fish below Grand Junction to <br />varying flows (amount of water commitment)? <br /> <br />3. 29, -reference No.9: DOW has asked for studies (creel census) to coincide with <br />Fish and Wildlife SeIVice studies (needs approval). Blue Mesa, Morrow Point, and Crystal <br />Reservoirs fisberies would be evaluated. <br /> <br />3. 30, Impact to Gold Medal fishery: How can effects be tied to operation changes <br />(DOW Study)? <br /> <br />3. 39, Over billions of years, how many species extinct? Study needed to determine <br />impacts on U.S.; common sense needed. . <br /> <br />81 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.