My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04003
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:53:12 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:05:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.200.05.P
Description
Hoover Dam/Lake Mead/Boulder Canyon Project
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
7/16/1983
Author
Region IX IFHMT
Title
Interagency Flood Hazard Mitigation Report in Response to the July 1 1983 Disaster Declarations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />c.: <br />CD <br />c. <br />~ <br /> <br />c.. <br /> <br />development does not occur in areas of high ground water as evi- <br />dencea by th1S d1saster or in floodplains. <br /> <br />~<:!~;(.) <br />';-'...~.. . <br /> <br />Background: Many political entities, including federal agencies, <br />Tribes, states, counties, and cities have jurisdiction over land <br />use of various segments along the Lower Colorado River. For many <br />reasons (apathy, ignorance of the potential problem, political <br />pressures and economic reasons, insufficient enforcement resources, <br />and poorly defined authorities and rights), strong control over <br />land use along the river has not been exercised in the past. The <br />lax enforcement of regulations to building in the floodplain has <br />compounded the extent and scope of damages resulting from flooding <br />along the Lower Colorado River. Federal, state and, in most cases, <br />county policies regulating development within the Colorado River's <br />floodplain exist, yet continual and ongoing development is occur- <br />ring. Considering this pattern of development within the floodplain, <br />the Interagency team has identified the foregoing issues that <br />address the problems such development presents. <br /> <br />Action Agency: <br />Financing: <br />Schedule: <br /> <br />All affected counties and cities <br /> <br />None required <br /> <br />Federal Emergency Management AgencylState Hazard <br />Mitigation Coordinators will meet with the commu- <br />nities within 30 days. <br />This work element should be included in the State's <br />Hazard Mitigation Plans, required by Section 406, <br />P.L. 93-288 <br /> <br />~t;~~ <br /> <br />WORK ELEMENT #11 <br /> <br />Local qovernments should formulate procedures to implement the non- <br />specific "anchorinq_~ ~ -"us.e of appropriate construction methods <br />and materiCiP' and "public utilities" requir~~~~~~_?f the NFIP. <br /> <br />Background: Floodplains throughout the United States have many <br />different characteristics. For example, some floods are charact- <br />erized by high velocity floodwater with a short duration and little <br />warning, while others are characterized as predictable with low <br />velocity water that may inundate structures for months. Therefore, <br />specific nationwide standards can not be provided for all aspects <br />of floodplain development. In order to properly develop a <br />specific site it is often necessary to perform a site specific <br />analysis to determine the appropriate development standards. A <br />common practice used in many states is that local governments <br />require the developers to provide a site specific engineering <br />analysis to establish the standards. <br /> <br />Action Agency: Federal Emergency Management Agency <br />State and local Hazard Mitigation Coordinators <br /> <br />Financing: None required <br /> <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.