My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03964
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03964
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:53:01 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:03:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.110.60
Description
Colorado River Water Users Association
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
12/4/1958
Author
CRWUA
Title
Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />dating in semi-arid western America is a climatic one. This controlling <br />factor turns out to be precipitation -- soil moisture -- water. In essence <br />then, although I admit this is an over-simplification, the tree will put <br />down a thick ring in a year of ample moisture and a thin ring in a year of <br />drought. <br /> <br />******* <br /> <br />A PHYSICAL BASIS FOR DEPENDABLE ANNUAL <br />STREAMFLOW FORECASTS <br />Dr. Irving P. Krick, President <br />Irving P. Krick Associates, Inc. <br />Denver, Colorado <br /> <br />The large variations observed in seasonal and monthly distribution <br />of the annual runoff in most river basinll poses a major problem in the <br />operation of hydroelectric power systems, flood control, and irrigation. <br />For example, in projecting firm power capabilities for a year ahead, most <br />power producers consider rule curves based upon a low water year and upon <br />the median water year. Some improvement on this procedure has recently <br />been achieved by the use of a combination of historical streamflow correl- <br />ations and antecedent conditions for the determination of an initial point on <br />the "dependable" streamflow projection at the time of each forecast. Then <br />the critical water year curve is used to project from this point. <br /> <br />Unfortunately, such a procedure still tends to minimize the total <br />inflow forecast at the outset of each water year and to fix the shape of the <br />streamflow curve from month to month. In the Columbia River Basin, for <br />example, it invariably leads to a forecast of sharp streamflow reductions <br />in winter to conform to the critical year (1936-37) characteristics. The <br />low flows during the winter period in that year were related to a rare weath- <br />er sequence and therefore one of infrequent occurrence. Thus the estima- <br />tion of firm power capabilities, based upon this unusual characteristic in <br />the 1937 winter, greatly minimizes the flexibility of power system operation <br />in the area during most years. <br /> <br />As the season progresses streamflow estimates for various river <br />basins are issued monthly by a number of agencies. Current flow data are <br />projected on the basis of snow survey information and the use of normal <br />precipitation for the balance of the season. All manner of correlations <br />have been developed in order to produce streamflow probabilities within <br />various ranges, but all of them suffer from the same limitation--an inad- <br />equate knowledge of the actual sequence of precipitation and temperatures <br />which will be responsible for streamflow during the course of a water year. <br /> <br />This paper outlines procedures for forecasting the Ilequence of pre- <br /> <br />- 14 - <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.