My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03940
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03940
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:52:54 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:03:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.470
Description
Pacific Southwest Interagency Committee
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/7/1981
Author
PSIAC
Title
Minutes of the 81-1 Meeting - April 7-8 1981
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />develop management plans for each active management area. The <br />first of these plans is to be promulgated by January 1 of 1983 <br />[or COIIU1lcnt ilnd to uucomc cffoctivo in JilnU<lry of 1985. Now 1 <br />should have pointed out to you earlier, the goal of these manage- <br />ment plans for the Phoenix, Tucson and Prescott active management <br />areas where we are talking basically about urban economies even <br />though there is a lot of agriculture left in these basins, we are <br />talking about a municipal-industrial economy that we are attempting <br />to protect - the statutory goal of those three active management <br />areas is to achieve safe yield, a balance between the available <br />water SUPply and the consumption of the water supply, by the <br />year 2025, using the CAP water supply and conservation and other <br />means. In Pinal County, which has basically an agricultrual <br />ecopomy, there is very little municipal-industrial economy in the <br />portion that is in the Pinal AMA, the goal there is planned <br />depletion much along the lines of the New Mexico statutes. It may <br />cha~ge in the future if the area begins to urbanize but the differ- <br />ence here is in recognition of the fact that it is an agricultural <br />economy. If you force it to a safe-yield type of operation, it <br />would destroy the economy. But if you leave it and let economics <br />take its course and extend the life of that basin through a planned <br />depletion type of operation, by the time the depths to groundwater <br />a~d pumping energy costs have risen to drive agriculture off the <br />basin, a substantial amount of water will still remain for anybody <br />that wants to continue to live there. <br />The first plan that is to be promulgated by 1983 for comment <br />and modification and then becomes effective in Janaury of 1985, <br />survives only until January 1 of 1990. It is basically a five-year <br />plan. Thereafter, two years be~ore the next decade begins, the <br /> <br />1'3-16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.