My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03845
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03845
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:52:26 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:00:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.450
Description
McElmo Creek Unit - Colorado River Salinity Control Program
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
7
Date
3/1/1992
Title
Monitoring and Evaluation Report for the McElmo Creek Unit of the Colorado River Basic Salinity Control Program 1991 Annual Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />III. WILDLIFE MONITORING & EVALUATION <br /> <br />A. IlI'tllODUCTIOR: <br /> <br />Wildlife upland and wetland habitat is being monitored <br />at selected sites in the McElmo Creek salinity Control Unit. <br />These sites (as outlined in the McElmo creek EIS) include 15 <br />contracts (farm units) selected each year from the first <br />three years of the salinity Program for a total of 45 sites. <br />Habitat changes are presently being tracked for all salinity <br />contracts to measure habitat quality and quantity (for <br />existing, planned and applied conditions). <br /> <br />B. OBJECTIVES: <br /> <br />The McElmo Creek Salinity Control Unit, located in a <br />once xeric basin with irrigated agriculture introduced 75 <br />years ago, contains extensive wetlands associated with over- <br />irrigation, seepage (canal, lateral and ditch) losses, and <br />accumulation (perching) in geological depressions (includes <br />drainages). As irrigation systems and management practices <br />become more efficient water supply to these wetlands will be <br />diminished. Losses of upland habitat will occur in order to <br />facilitate these new systems (such as incidental field <br />squaring, ditch removal, etc.). Evaluations will be made to <br />measure the impacts of salinity project implementation to <br />wetland and upland wildlife habitat and to also assess the <br />effectiveness of voluntary actions by landowners to replace <br />or mitigate for any habitat losses attributed to irrigation <br />system improvement. These evaluations will be conducted to <br />document existing, planned (projected) and applied <br />conditions for every contract. <br /> <br />C. METHODOLOGY: <br /> <br />Habitat quality will be determined by using the U.s. <br />FiSh and Wildlife Service Habitat Evaluation Procedures <br />(HEP). Habitat data gathered from individual salinity <br />contracts and randomly selected monitoring sites will be <br />used to calculate Habitat suitability Index (HSI) values for <br />selected wildlife species. The HSI is a numerical index <br />rating which measures habitat quality for wildlife species <br />on a scale of zero (0) to one (1). The value attained <br />reflects the potential of a habitat type to support a <br />specific wildlife species. (HSI models basically look at the <br />life requisites, food, water and cover, of a species and <br />their seasonable availability to that species.). An HSI <br />value of 1.0 implies an area has the greatest potential to <br />support the selected wildlife species, while a value of .1 <br />denotes significantly lower potential (one-tenth of ~'~~ <br />potential to support that species) for that species to $~i~V <br />in the area. \.'~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.