Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />0662 <br /> <br />ditch rider would set the State headgates for the proper <br />number of shares, the same as for other shareholders. Of <br />the water obtained at the State headgates, only that portion <br />corresponding to actual consumptive use from the historic use <br />land could be transported to storage in John Martin Reservoir. <br />The remaining water would be left in the Arkansas River system <br />to compensate for historic return flow. The State Engineer <br />would deduct transit losses from water deliveries for storage <br />in John Martin Reservoir, and an average of 4,704 acre-feet <br />of storable water could be delivered to the reservoir each <br />year under this plan. <br /> <br />The report also shows how the transfer plan and the proposed <br />permanent pool operation would have worked under historic <br />conditions during compact years 1949-73. The beginning per- <br />manent pool storage was assumed to be 10,000 acre-feet. The <br />permanent pool was allowed to ride on top of the conservation <br />pool to a maximum size of 15,000 acre-feet except the reser- <br />voir's flood control storage could not be invaded by more than <br />10,000 acre-feet. Evaporation was deducted on a daily basis <br />from the additional surface area caused by adding the per- <br />manent pool to the conservation pool. During this 25-year <br />period, the minimum permanent pool storage was 6,800 acre- <br />feet and the average was 12,400 acre-feet. An annual average <br />of 399 acre-feet of storable water could not be utilized under <br />these conditions and was released for the benefit of irri- <br />gators below John Martin Dam. The State owns or has the use <br />of other water rights that will be incorporated in the per- <br />manent pool plan, and inclusion of these water rights in the <br />plan will substantially increase the benefits to irrigators <br />below the dam. <br /> <br />-2- <br />