My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03823
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03823
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:52:20 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:00:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8135.300
Description
Ditch Companies - Catlin
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/29/1976
Author
D Helton R McCabe
Title
Catlin Transfer Plan and John Martin Permanent Pool Operation
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />-- <br /> <br />0667 <br /> <br />dividuals and organizations wanted the permanent pool not <br />only for the recreation it would provide, but also because <br />they thought it would generate tourism and attract industry. <br />They contended that since it was constructed entirely at <br />Federal p.xpense, it should benefit mote people than just <br />those who benefit from its flood conttol and conservation of <br />irrigation water. This public demand sparked the interest of <br />the State. <br /> <br />The first step in the creation of a permanent pool was obtain- <br />ing Congressional authorization that would allow the permanent <br />pool to invade flood control space in the reservoir. This <br />necessary authorization was obtained in October 1965, with the <br />enactment of P.L. 89-298 (79-Stat. 1073 in Appendix B). The <br />permanent pool would ride on top of the conservation pool and <br />would occupy flood control space only when the conservation <br />pool was full or nearly full. The invasion would be limited <br />to 10,000 acre-feet and could be justified because various <br />flood-retarding projects, including several soil conservation <br />projects and Trinidad and Pueblo Reservoirs, had been or soon <br />would be completed. <br /> <br />Several water rights were available to the State, but they <br />would not, by themselves, provide an adequate permanent pool <br />water supply. These included 107 shares in the Fort Lyon <br />Canal company, 44 shares in the Las Animas Town Ditch Company <br />(these shares were sold to the High Line Canal Company in <br />1972), and 128 shares of the Consolidated Extension canal Com- <br />pany. They were obtained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <br />during land acquisition for the John Martin Project. The state <br />also has a decree that will allow storage of up to 5,000 acre- <br />feet of Muddy Creek water in John Martin Reservoir. These <br />water rights will eventually be included in the permanent pool <br />operation. <br /> <br />In 1969 the Colorado General Assembly appropriated $1,050,000 <br />for the acquisition of the water supply for John Martin per- <br />manent pool. Several water rights and water systems were con- <br />.sidered for purchase. It was not until spring of 1972 that <br />adequate water rights were obtained with the purchase of 2,097.58 <br />shares of capital stock in the catlin Canal Company. In Sep- <br />tember 1973, an application to change the water right (Case W-4025) <br />associated with these shares was filed in the District Court for <br />Water Division 2. This change is necessary to allow the water <br /> <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.