My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03787
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03787
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:52:08 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:58:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
5000.100
Description
Flood Protection Section - Coal Creek Project
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
6/18/1980
Author
Rocky Mountain Consu
Title
City of Louisville - Stream Classification Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />UOl()88 <br /> <br />Mr. leon A. Wurl <br />Page Fou r <br /> <br />The City had two samples taken May 29, 1980 and June la, 1980 (see <br />Attachment "B") by Industrial laboratories Co., and Rinehart labora- <br />tories, Inc., respectively, at the locations shown in Figure 3. <br />These tests show that the influent ammonia-nitrogen levels were 12.9 <br />and 23.33 mg/I. I t was assumed that the winter influent ammonia <br />parameter would be 25.0 mg/I at 50oF. <br /> <br />(B) Effluent Standard <br /> <br />Any ammonia level established for Coal Creek would have to relate to <br />low flows in the channel. Additionally, the temperature, pH and flows <br />from the City's discharge would mix with the same parameters in the <br />Creek to reach a mix of allowable in-stream total ammonia nitrogen <br />concentration. Since none of the aforementioned parameters were known <br />for Coal Creek, an assumed discharge of 3 mg/I of total ammonia was <br />considered adequate. <br /> <br />(C) Plant layout <br /> <br />Since so much speculation is involved with the influent and effluent <br />parameters, a specific plant layout could not be determined. Waste- <br />water mayor may not have to be ) ifted on the site to provide for the <br />ultimate treatment train. Cost estimates are, therefore, preliminary <br />in nature but should provide a reasonable means of comparison. <br /> <br />(D) Plant Staging <br /> <br />The existing louisvi lie Wastewater Treatment Plant has a capacity of <br />1.0 MGD. A proposed addition, currently in the prel iminary design <br />stage, is sized at 0.34 MGD, at which point the plant wi 11 be at <br />50 percent of its ul timate requi rement. I f ammonia removal is <br />required, it will have to be added to the following capacities: <br /> <br />Existing Plant <br />Current Addition <br />Remaining Capacity Required <br /> <br />Total <br /> <br />I .00 MG 0 <br />.34 MGD <br />~MGD <br /> <br />2.68 MGD <br /> <br />Based upon the above, ammonia removal would require the fol lowing <br />capital expenditures: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.