Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6 <br /> <br />BASE-FLOW DATA AVAILABLE <br /> <br />The analyses in this report are based on records of streamflow that <br />have been collected at 105 sites in Kansas and adjoining areas. For 84 of <br />these sites, identified by solid triangles in figure 1, the streamflow records <br />of at least 10 years duration have been used to define monthly values of <br />base flow in order to develop base-flow probability curves at each site <br />(fig. 12-95) and to develop regional base-flow relations for the State. For <br />21 sites, identified by open triangles in figure 1, streamflow records of less <br />than 10 years duration have been analyzed to define the approximate base- <br />flow relations shown in table 1, (p.lll). The total of 105 stations include <br />all stations in Kansas with records long enough for analysis and with basins <br />small enough (less than about 5,000 sq. mi.) for reliably separating the <br />base-flow component from total flow. <br /> <br />The basic information for these studies is contained in Technical <br />report 6A, Base Flow Data (Busby and Armentrout, 1965). The report con- <br />tains detailed information of the meaning of base flow, methods of compu- <br />tations, and the following data for each of the 84 long-term gaging stations: <br />(l) location of each site, (2) monthly and yearly mean base flow as com- <br />puted from the records of total streamflow, and (3) two-thirds chance <br />limits of likely values of monthly and yearly base flow during ungaged peri- <br />ods, when these values are needed to extend the records to a long-term <br />period common to all sites. The long-term period was selected by pro- <br />cedures described in the following section. <br /> <br />Selection of Base Period <br /> <br />For statewide long-range water-planning purposes, base-flow rela- <br />tions should be founded on the following criteria: (1) the period of record <br />on which they are founded should be long enough to encompass a represen- <br />tative sample of wet and dry periods; and (2) the relations should repre- <br />sent the experience of the same standard period of years to permit un- <br />biased comparison of basin characteristics. <br /> <br />The available periods of streamflow records in Kansas are much too <br />short to furnish an adequate sample of past experience for fully reliable <br />prediction of future flows. But to obtain information now, it is necessary <br />to select from the available records a long-term standard period, called a <br />base period, that is as long and as representative as possible. <br /> <br />Earlier low-.flow studies in this series of technical reports for Kan- <br />sas had used the years 1921-56 as the base period, but for base-flow studies, <br />daily streamflow records were collected at too few stations in 1921 and 1922 <br />