Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Development of Estimated Daily Flows - Yampa River at Maybell <br /> <br />groundwater return flows (stream depletion on any given day is the net of diversions and return <br />flows on that day). <br /> <br />In order to estimate historical depletions due to irrigation, an EXCEL spreadsheet was <br />created to calculate actual consumptive use and return flows to the Yampa River. This analysis <br />was conducted for each of the eight land groupings identified. Input to this calculation included <br />I) irrigated area; 2) historical diversions to those lands; 3) potential consumptive use; and 4) <br />assumptions relating to ditch losses, application efficiencies, and return flow characteristics. <br />Return flow characteristics reflected distance from the irrigated lands to the river and hydraulic <br />conductivities of the underlying soils. These characteristics were used in a Glover analysis to <br />determine monthly groundwater return flow lag factors. <br /> <br />Input data on irrigated lands, diversions and potential consumptive use were determined <br />as previously described. Values for ditch loss rates, application efficiencies and return flow <br />characteristics were assumed based on engineering judgment. We believe these assumptions <br />are generally consistent with the methods of irrigation in the Yampa River Basin and the <br />location of irrigated lands (Table 2). <br /> <br />Table 2 <br />land Grouping Characteristics Used in Glover Analysis of Return Flows <br /> <br />Group Irrigated Ditch Application Valley Hydraulic Specific Saturated <br /> Area loss Efficiency Width Conductivity Yield Thickness <br /> lac.) (%J (%1 (ft.) (ft./dl (ft.) <br />I 21,500 10 45 4,000 400 0.2 20 <br />2 14,100 10 45 4,000 300 0.2 20 <br />3 500 10 45 2,000 200 0.2 20 <br />4 8,000 10 45 2,000 300 0.2 20 <br />5 6,600 10 45 4,000 200 0.2 20 <br />6 2,200 10 45 2,000 200 0.2 20 <br />7 5,600 10 45 3,000 200 0.2 20 <br />8 10,200 10 45 2,000 175 0.2 20 <br /> <br />The agricultural depletion analysis generated eight sets of nw~y depletion values. <br />Generally speaking, depletions are positive (diversions are greatee,return flows in each month) <br />during the months of April through July. During the remaining months of the year, depletions <br />are generally negative (return flows are greater than diversions in each month). Monthly <br />depletion volumes were then converted to daily values using a spline interpolation scheme. <br />Each of the eight daily data sets were then routed downstream based on the average distance of <br />each land grouping from the Maybell gage and the travel time estimates discussed below. <br /> <br />Estimated monthly depletions generated through the analysis were then compared to <br />similar estimates by Division 6 for the period 1976 to 1982. On average the comparison was <br />quite close. However, the Division 6 estimates tended to show somewhat more variability from <br />year to year. AgrkultlJral depletions estimated through this study averaged roughly 78.000 <br />acre-feet per year and ranged from a high of over 97,000 acre-feet (1978) to a low of 46.500 <br /> <br />6 <br />