Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Development of Estimated Daily Flows - Yampa River at Maybell <br /> <br />Aggregation of Irrigated Areas <br /> <br />The current distribution of irrigated land in the basin was examined from the perspective <br />of climatic zone, distance from the Maybell gage, and irrigation practice. From these <br />considerations, eight groupings of lands were defined for consumptive use estimation purposes <br />(Table I). All lands within each group were treated as if they constituted a single parcel of <br />irrigated land. Potential consumptive use rates for each of the eight land groupings were <br />developed in consideration of each area's proximity to one of the four climate stations. <br />Furthermore, cropping type was considered to appropriately weight PCU for differences in <br />crop proportions between land groups. The PCU rates were then applied to the number of <br />acres in each grouping to estimate monthly potential consumptive use. in acre-feet; over the <br />study period. <br /> <br />Table 1 <br />Designation of Irrigated land Groupings for Estimation of Agricultural Depletions <br /> <br />Group <br /> <br />Irrigated Area Included in Grouping <br /> <br />Climate Station <br /> <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br /> <br />Yampa River/Tribs. ab. Steamboat and Elk River/Tribs. ab. Mad Creek <br />Yampa River/Tribs. between Milner and Steamboat Springs <br />Yampa River/Tribs. between Mount Harris and Milner <br />Trout Creek/Tribs. and Williams Fork ab. Hamilton <br />Yampa River/Tribs. between Mount Harris and Elkhead Creek <br />Elkhead Creek/Tribs. <br />Yampa River/Tribs. between Elkhead Creek andWilliams Fork <br />Yampa River/Tribs. bel. Craig and Morapos Creek <br /> <br />Yampa <br />Steamboat <br />Steamboat <br />Steamboat <br />Hayden <br />Hayden <br />Craig <br />Craig <br /> <br />Historical Diversions <br /> <br />Records of historical diversions by all irrigation ditches in the Yampa River Basin were <br />supplied by the Office of the State Engineer, Division of Water Resources. This data was <br />available in both daily format and as monthly totals for each diversion structure. With the <br />exception of the Maybell Canal, only monthly totals were examined. <br /> <br />Diversion data was provided in electronic DBase format and was systematically filtered <br />to develop a set of diversion records for only those ditches upstream of the Maybell Gage. The <br />Maybell Canal was excluded from this subset (discussed below). The data were then cross <br />referenced with data on irrigated lands to develop eight sets of diversion data which were <br />geographically consistent with the geographic groupings shown in Table I. Each of the data <br />sets consisted of 33 years of monthly diversion volumes (acre-feet). <br /> <br />Irrigation Depletion Analysis <br /> <br />Potential consumptive use is an upper-bound estimate of actual consumptive use. Actual <br />consumptive use will generally be less than potential consumptive use because of water supply <br />shortages and irrigation and harvesting practices. Furthermore, the temporal pattern of actual <br />stream depletion is different irom that of actual consumptive use because of the lagging of <br /> <br />5 <br />