Laserfiche WebLink
<br />136 <br /> Table 3 (continued) <br /> Anticipated <br /> Scheduled Scheduled 1983 Co\. (4) <br /> 1981 1982 Scheduled Minus <br />Month Delivery Delivery Delivery Co\. (3) <br />(I) (2) (3) (4) (5) <br />Ocr, 57,209 56,398 56.750 351 <br />Nov. 54,519 55,857 56,750 892 <br />Dec, 102,834 107,548 114,572 2,857 <br />Total 1,700,000 1,500,000 I, 700,000 200,000 <br /> <br />r- <br />0') <br />0-" <br />N <br />Cl <br />Cl <br /> <br />The above was taken from an Upper Colorado River Commission <br />memorandum of January 17, 1983, <br />14, 43 U,S,CA, Sec. 1512, <br />15, 43 U,S,CA, Sec, 1511. <br />16, 43 U,S,CA, Sec, 1552, <br />17, Acr of 6 July 1866, Chap, 262, 14 Srat, 251. <br />18, Hunter v, Uni"," Sw<es, 388 F. 2d 148, CA. 9, Ca\. 1967, <br />19, Meyers, "The Colorado River," Swnford Law Re<'icw 19 (1966), <br />p, 1. <br />20. This concept that appropriated water would have to yield to the <br />obligations of the Mexican treaty is discussed in some detail in Meyers "The <br />Colorado River." <br />21. Pre""" v, Greenaux, 19 How, I, 15 L. Ed, 572 (1857), <br />22, 43 U.s.C Sec, 1512, <br />23, 657 F. 2d 275 (1981), See al"" Richard Hennig and Janice Olson, <br />"The Colorado River Salinity Problem-Old Approaches to a New Issue," <br />Land and Water Review 11 (1976), p, 459; N, A, Evans, "Salt Problem in <br />rhe Colorado River," Narural Resource> Journal 15 (1975), p, 55, <br />24, 33 U.s.C Secs, I3I3(a)-(e) (1976 Supp, III 1979), <br />25, 43 U,S,C Sec, 1591 (1976 and Supp, III 1979), <br />26, 42 U,S,C Sec, 4332(2)(E) (1976 and Supp, III 1979), <br />27, 54 Srat, 774, <br />28, Clyde "Legal Aspects of the Colorado River," p, 26, <br />29, 103 s, Cr, 539 (1982), <br />30, 304 U,S, 92 (1938), <br />J l. A series of articles deal with such peculiar problems which relate <br />to only part of the states. Article X recognizes the La Plata River Compact. <br />entered into between the states of Colorado ~nd New Mexico in 1922. Article <br /> <br />, <br />,: <br /> <br />RESPONSE TO PROLONGED DROUGHT <br /> <br />137 <br /> <br />~; <br /> <br />XI deals with the waters of the Little Snake River, which was a problem <br />relating exclusively to Colorado and Wyoming. Article XII rel~tes to the <br />consumptive use of water from Henry's Fork, Beaver Creek, Burnt Fork, <br />Birch Creek. Sheep Creek, and their tributaries. These ~re of concern to <br />Wyoming and Utah. Articles X, XI, and XII all provide that water used from <br />the particular tributaries named shall be charged against the srates under the <br />apportionment made by Anicle III. <br />32. Upper Colorado Rit'eT Basin Compact Cummisslon Record, yol. 2, pp. <br />76 and 80, . <br />33, Ibid,. p, 80, <br />34, Meyers, "The Colorado River," p, I. <br />35, Edward W, Clyde, "The Colorado River DeclSlon- I 963," p, 299, <br />See, also, Frank J. Trelease "Arizona \'. California: Allocation of Water Re- <br />sources to People, States, and the Nation," The Supreme Court Ret.:iew (1963), <br />p, 158, <br />36, Ca!. Srat, 1929, chap, 15, p, 67, <br />37, 43 U,S,CA, Sec, 1521(b), <br />38, 438 U,S, 645 (1978), <br />.19, 96 Utah 403, 80 p, 2d 454 (1938), <br />40, See also Spanish Fork West Field ITT, Co, v, District Co",r, 99 Urah <br />527, 104 p, 2d 353 (1940), <br />41. 373 U,S, 546 (1963), <br />42, 438 U,S, 645 (1978), <br />43, 304 U,S, 92 (1938), <br />44, Clyde, Conflicts Between !he Upper and Lawer Basins on rhe Colarado <br />River. <br />45, Alabama v. Texas. 347 U,S, 272, 273,98 L. Ed, 689, 693, 74 Sup, <br />Cr, 481 (1954), reh, den, 347 U,S, 950. 98 L. Ed, 1097, 74 Sup, Cr, 674 <br />(1954), See also United Swccs v, City and County of San FralU:isco, 310 U,S, <br />16,84 L. Ed, 1050,60 Sup, Ct. 749 (1940), Ivanhoe ITTig, Dut. v, McCracken, <br />357 U,S, 275, 2 L. Ed, 2d 1313, 78 Sup, Cr. 1174 (1958), <br />46, United S"'CC, v, Gerlach, 339 U,S, 725 (1950); F.P.c. v, Niagara <br />Mohawk Power Co., 347 U,S, 239, <br />47, See Ivanhoe ITT, Co, v, McCracken, 357 U,S, 275 (1958); United <br />Sw",s v, Public Utiliry Comm., 355 U,S, 534 (1958), <br />48, Ari~ona v, California, 373 U,S, 546 (1963), <br />49, SporMse v, Nebraska. 1025, Cr. 3456 (1982), <br />50. See Felix Frankfurter and James Landis, "The Compact Clause of <br />the Constitution-A Study in Interstate Adjustments," Yale Law Journal 34 <br />(1925), p, 685, Clyde, Conflicts BerU'een the Bl1.Iim of the Colorado Rit'CT; S""e <br /> <br />:, <br />,. <br /> <br />, <br />;,i <br />;." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />~ 1 <br />!: <br />r <br />