|
<br />134
<br />
<br />Edward W. Clyde
<br />
<br />is 23 percent of the Upper Basin allocation) and will curtail devel-
<br />opment at approximarely 1,325,000 acre-feet (which is 23 percent of
<br />the longtime average which will be available to the Upper Basin),
<br />the users within that development level should have a dependable
<br />supply. If development goes beyond that, there will be the hardship
<br />and the conflict caused by the need for curtailment,
<br />
<br />Notes
<br />
<br />(.0
<br />~
<br />~
<br />('\J
<br /><:'l
<br /><::')
<br />
<br />1. 373 U,S, 546 (1963),
<br />2, Kansro v, Colorado, 206 U,S, 46 (1907); ,ee "Iso Hinderlider v, L,P""il
<br />and Cherry Creek Ditch Co., 304 U,S, 92 (J9J8); but see Colu".I" v, New
<br />Mexico, 1035,0, 539 (1982),
<br />3, Boulder Canyon ProjeetAct, 45 Stat, 1057, Edward W, Clyde. "Legol
<br />Aspects of the Development of the Colurado River," Utah Law Re\Jiew 1
<br />(1949), p, 26,
<br />4, Edward W, Clyde, Conflicts Betweell .he Upper and Lower Broins on
<br />che Colorado River (Western Resources Conference Resource Development
<br />for Research, 1960),
<br />5, In 2 5, C. Kinney, Irrigation and IVater Rights, 2d ed, (San Francisco,
<br />1912), the rule is stated as follows: "not only may a valid appropriation of
<br />the water from a natural stream be made (or immediate use, but the water
<br />may be saved up and stored in times of plenty and thus saved (or the ultimate
<br />purpose of using the same in times of scarcity for irrigation, or any other
<br />useful purpose," See, also, Robert Emmet Clark, Water and Water Rights
<br />(Indianapolis, 1972); I Wells Hutchins, Wa'er Rights ww, ill the Nineteen
<br />Western Stales (Washington, D.C., 1971); Joseph Ragland Long. Imgdtion.
<br />See. 276, 2d ed, (Denver, 1916); I Samuel Charles Weil. IValcr Rights mthe
<br />\\'lestem States 10, 3d ed, (San Francisco, 1911); Edwards v, City of Cheyenne,
<br />19 Wyo, 110, 114 p, 611 (1911); Van Trosel Real E'.I1e & Liwstock Co. v,
<br />City of Cheyenne, 54 p, 2d 906 (Wyoming, 1936); A-B Callie Co, v, U.S"
<br />589 p, 2d 57 (Colorado, 1979); Friends of ,he Earlh \'. Armstrong, 485 F. 2d
<br />I, 10 Cir, (1973); Ero[ Side Call1li ITT, Co, v, U,S" 76 F. Supp, 836 (Ct. CI.
<br />1948), cert. dellied, 339 U,S, 978 (1950),
<br />6, Congressiolllli Record (JO January 1923), pp, 2713-17,
<br />7, Extract from the CongressioMI Record (30 Janu"ry 1923), pp. 2710-
<br />
<br />13,
<br />
<br />8. In a hearing on S. 500, 84th Cong., 1st sess., before the Subcom-
<br />mittee on Irrigation and Reclamation of the Committee on Interior and
<br />Insular Affairs.
<br />
<br />(.,
<br />~ (:.
<br />
<br />'.'
<br />
<br />:'t' :
<br />, .'
<br />., _I
<br />::j ~,.
<br />r Ii'.
<br />,~. jr.:
<br />I. l(
<br />I :i
<br />:~:
<br />
<br />i
<br />
<br />I,
<br />.\ "
<br />I ,,"~
<br />, ,
<br />,
<br />
<br />,.'
<br />
<br />:i
<br />
<br />t
<br />
<br /><,
<br />
<br />,.
<br />i'
<br />.
<br />I,
<br />~
<br />I
<br />,
<br />I.
<br />j,
<br />
<br /> .I.
<br /> \!
<br /> ,.
<br /> 'i'
<br /> ,
<br /> I.
<br /> ~
<br /> ~,
<br />)
<br />,
<br /> , i
<br /> ,
<br />
<br />
<br />RESPONSE TO PROLONGED DROUGHT
<br />
<br />135
<br />
<br />9, See Senate Doc, 96, 85th Cong" 1 May 1978, See, also, Clyde,
<br />Conflicts Between lhe Upper and Lower Broins on the Colorado River,
<br />10, Ward Bannister, "The Colorado River Compact, "Cornell WI).' QUilr-
<br />terly 9 (1923-24); Jean S, Breitenstein, "Water Administration Under the
<br />Proposed Treary with Mexico: American Bar Association ]ouTlUlI 31 (1945),
<br />p. 67; Julius M. Friedrich, "The Settlement of Dispules Between States
<br />Concerning Rights to the Water of Interstate Streams," lou'a Lau.' Review 32
<br />(1947), p, 244; Clyde, "Legal Aspects of the Development of the Colorado
<br />River"j C. H. Stone, "Interstate Water Compacts," Rocky 7\.1oumain Law
<br />Review 24 (1951-52); Clyde, 'Current Developments in Waler Law," North-
<br />western ww Review 53, no, 6 (1959). p, 725; Frank Trelease, "Federal Lim.
<br />itations "nd State Waler Law," Buffalo ww R<<'ieu' 10 (1960), p, 399; Clyde,
<br />"Present Contlicts on the Colorado River," Rocky Mountain Lau' ReView 534
<br />(1960); Clyde, ConfliClS Be[w<<n [he Upper and wu.'er Broins on ,he Colorado
<br />Rj",,; Clyde, "The Colorado River Decision-196J: Utah ww Redeu.' 8 (1963-
<br />64), p, 299; Charles Meyets, "The Colorado River," Stanford ww Review 19
<br />(1966), p, I; W, D, Back and S, 5, Taylor, "Navajo Water Right" Pulling
<br />the Plug on the Colorado Rived," Natural Resources Journal 20 (January
<br />1980), P, 71.
<br />II. Arizona v, California (30 March 1983), Law Week Extra Edilion
<br />no, 2,
<br />12, Act, of 3 February 1944, 59 Stat, 1219,
<br />13, Table 3. Scheduled Water Deliveries 10 Mexico in Calendar
<br />Years 1981, 1982, and 1983
<br />
<br /> Anticipated
<br /> Scheduled Scheduled 1983 Col. (4)
<br /> 1981 1982 Scheduled Minus
<br />Month Delivery Delivery Delivery Col. (3)
<br />(I) (2) (3) (4) (5)
<br />Jan, 55,370 126.192 64,057 -29,594
<br />Feb, 81,731 121,653 107,506 - 6,039
<br />Mar, 211.991 217,827 234,436 16,609
<br />Apr, 241,042 230,990 262,057 31.068
<br />May 155,617 114,202 \32, \33 \3,877
<br />June 178,542 105,669 153,054 35,195
<br />July 220.798 133,612 203,670 61,952
<br />Aug, 234,825 140,714 218,931 70,110
<br />Sepr, 105,522 89,308 96,084 2.722
<br />
|