Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1981 and 1982 due to the Central Utah Project. Other than these.in- <br />creases, the general trend in dependable capacity is downward after 1975 <br />due to the anticipated upstream water depletions by the participating <br />projects. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />d. Power marketing criteria. The original power marketing <br />criteria established in 1962. that CRSP power would be sold by summer and <br />winter seasons to customers located in the market area, as described in <br />Subparagraph D(l), with priority being given to preference customers and <br />with the provision that, as loads develop, power could be withdrawn from <br />the Southern Division for sale in the Northern Division until the loads <br />in the Southern Division are reduced to 20 percent of the project capa- <br />bility in the summer season and 7 percent in the winter season. Allo- <br />cations of power were made, based on the applications received and the <br />CRSP generating capacity installed. Sales to customers with no supple- <br />mental supply are permitted by existing contracts to meet their total <br />requirements until April 1976, regardless of load factor. Sales to <br />customers with supplemental supply are generally permitted up to about <br />70 percent load factor until April 1976. <br /> <br />From April 1976 through fiscal year 1986, the maximum seasonal load <br />factor permitted will be 58.2 percent for all customers. This change in <br />marketing policy is planned because, as the CRSP generation decreases <br />due to increased water depletions, the need for purchases of firming <br />energy increases, and the price of such energy is constantly increasing. <br />Therefore, consistent with sound business principles, the amount of <br />energy purchases should be decreased to improve the financial feasibility <br />of the project. In addition to limiting project sales under existing <br />contracts after March 1976 to 58.2 percent load factor per season, it <br />has also been decided to market the power from future CRSP powerplant <br />additions as peaking power, i.e., sales of capacity without energy or <br />with return of energy. Also, at any time the CRSP saleable capacity <br />exceeds the present capacity contracted for, the excess capacity will be <br />sold without energy or with return of energy. <br /> <br />After expiration of the existing contracts, most of which will expire in <br />1986, it has been assumed that new contractual arrangements can be made <br />such that the firm energy and capacity sales will be equal to the gener- <br />ation available less transmission losses. <br /> <br />5. Expenses. Annual expenses of operating the CRSP power system <br />are shown in the repayment study (Table F-l). The several categories of <br />expenses are discussed below. <br /> <br />a. Operation and maintenance costs. The operation and main- <br />tenance costs of the project have been increasing steadily since the <br />project operation started in fiscal year 1964, due to increases in the <br />costs of labor, supplies, and maintenance parts. Much of the movable <br />equipment, which is included as an O&M cost, is nearing the end of its <br /> <br />32 <br />