My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03719
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03719
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:51:46 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:55:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8270.100
Description
Colorado River Basin Water Quality/Salinity -- Misc Water Quality
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
5/19/1977
Title
Final Environmental Statement - Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program - Volume II - Public Comment -- Part 2 of 2 -- Page 147 through end
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />..... <br />l\:l <br />00 <br />---1 <br /> <br />:;~~:? <br />--...0:-.-- <br /> <br />Reply: Credit for return flow is based on the amount of Colorado <br />River water returned. If some of the water treated is determined to <br />have originated from the Colorado River, then that portion would be <br />charged against Nevada's credit. The Bureau of Reclamation, State, <br />and local entities are coordinating the final determinations of those <br />flows that will be treated. In addition, the Bureau of Reclamation <br />has applied to the Nevada State Engineer for a permit to consumptively <br />use up to 14,600 acre-ft/yr of water from Las Vegas Wash. <br /> <br />7.. Comment: The entire Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Pro- <br />gram is geared at salt reduction at. Imperial Dam. With the amount of <br />U.S. bucks involved, I would like to have the actual p/m value reduc- <br />tions expected upstream of this point. In other words, what p/m value <br />reduction can we anticipate in the Virgin River or Lake Mead? Will <br />this project change population growth locations? <br /> <br />Reply: The effect on the Virgin River is addressed in reply to your <br />first comment. The cumulative effect of upstream units on Lake Mead is <br />addressed in your fourth COmment as noted. Chapter Ill, Section A.lS <br />of the DRAFT EIS stated that no significant changes in the growth pat- <br />terns of the Colorado River Basin are expected. <br /> <br />8. Comment: There seems to be a discrepancy as to the location of <br />the brine evapo:r-ation ponds near Las Vegas Wash. The. U.S. Geological <br />Survey Flood Prone Map shows that approximately half these ponds are <br />prone to a 100-year flood. According to this report, Corps of Engi- <br />neersFlood Prone Maps show this area not in the path of a 100-year <br />flood. There seems to be a contradiction here. <br /> <br />~{;t);; <br /> <br />~: As yet, the U.S. Geological Survey has not'conducted a flood <br />studY in the vicinity of the Wash. The map referred to was prepared <br />by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in conjunc- <br />tion with the city of Henderson. The city of Henderson is actively <br />engaged in the construction of flood protection facilities within its <br />corporate limits. As such, an extensive dike and drainage channel <br />have been constructed which will effectively divert all floodflows <br />shown on the subject map around the proposed evaporation ponds. In <br />addition, BMI industries have an extensive system of dikes and drains <br />for flood protection which would intercept flows prior to their reach- <br />ing the ponds. <br /> <br />The Corps of Engineers study only discusses floods within the Las <br />Vegas Wash Channel. Due to mapping scales, it is difficult to visu- <br />alize the relationship of the ponds to the Corps' projected flood <br />plain. <br /> <br />170 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.