My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03715
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03715
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:51:45 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:55:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449.919
Description
South Platte Projects
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
7/1/1968
Author
Wright Water Eng.
Title
Preliminary Report - Study of Integrated Water Use, South Platte River Basin, Water District No. 8
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />26 <br /> <br />HUNICIPAL WATER REQUIREHENTS <br /> <br />The rapid growth of municipal water use In the metropolitan area farming a <br />part of Water District No.8 is reflected by the figures compiled in Tables <br />\0 through \), These data were derived from the Metropolitan Water Study <br />Inventory and from records of the cities of Denver, Aurora, Englewood and <br />Littleton, The data cover the 16-years from 1952 through 1967, which is a <br />period of rapidly e~pandlng growth in population and water service for the <br />cities of Aurora, Denver, Littleton, and Englewood. As these cities have <br />grown, they have acquired water rights from the South platte River and <br />from ather sources to satisfy their continually expanding needs for water. <br />The yields of water rights owned by Denver, Aurora, Englewood, and Littleton <br />was also reported In the Metropolitan Water Study Inventory, and are summar- <br />Ized in Tables 14 and 15, Yields were determined for the study period 1952 <br />through 1957, which reflects one of the most severe water supply periods on <br />record and corresponds to the period of rapidly expanding municipal growth, <br />The period 1952 through 1957 Is comparable in severity to the drouth of the <br />1930's and because of the greater availability of stream flow and diversion <br />records for the I at ter per i od, it was ad"pted fc,r the determi nat i on of water <br />rights yields. <br /> <br />As urban development continues the value of agriculture to the area diminishes <br />in the face of rising land and water costs. Thus land Is taken out of farm- <br />ing for use in commercial and residential development, and the agricultural <br />water rights are converted to municipal use. Some Irrigation is still prac- <br />ticed by small farms and water is also required for Irrigation of parks and <br />golf courses, but the daminant use of water from the South Platte River in <br />Water District No.8 Is municipal, and this dominance will continue in the <br />future. <br /> <br />A municipal water system must provide a dependable supply of potable water <br />in sufficient quantity to meet the demands of domestic and industrial users, <br />and to provide fire protection at all times to the area served. In planning <br />for municipal supplies, a long range forecast and development period is <br />required and the year-round availability of water is assured by the acquisi- <br />tion of both direct flow and storage rights and the use of storage water to <br />even out variations In demand. It Is not possible to correlate municipal <br />water demands directly to the water district boundaries because water district <br />boundaries are based On Irrigation divisions and natural drainage divides <br />whereas municipal development tends to spread in all directions without <br />regard to either of the foregoing factors. Thus. although Denver and Aurora <br />occupy a minor portion of the area encompassed by Water District No.8, <br />together they account for a substantial proportion of the water used. <br /> <br />In general, municipalities which have direct flow rights from the South <br />Platte use, those rights first In satisfying their water demands. In the <br />case of the larger agencies direct flow rights are supplemented by storage <br />and other sources, such as the Homestake Diversion Project for Aurora, and for <br />Denver the Fraser River system water brought through the Hoffat Tunnel and <br />the water of the Blue River carried through the Roberts Tunnel. <br /> <br />Municipal water demands fluctuate widely depending on clImate, rainfall, <br />season, water rates and other factors, During the year the maximum daily <br />demand may be as much as 2.5 to 3.0 times the average daily demand, while <br />the maximum hourly demand will range from 1.8 to 2.5 times the average <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.