Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Annual Report For 1967 <br /> <br />[n order to relieve a nood situation that has caused several breaks <br />in our canal over the years we have asked the Soil Conservation engineers <br />to make a survey and ouUine the most practical way to relieve this con- <br />dition. When this survey is completed and apprm'ed we hope to set up a <br />project with the Agricultural Stabilization Conservation office that would <br />share cost the expense. We have assurances that the Hiway Department <br />would provide the necessary bridge (or Hiway 50 over a channel to the <br />river for fiood water. <br /> <br />Such a project would require signatures of a major share of our <br />stockholders which will have to be secured in the near future. When <br />the Reservoir is ernpt)' and we are on river run, a break in the upper part <br />of our canal can be very costly in water lost. This is an effort to guard <br />against these losses. <br /> <br />During the year the Arkansas River Compact Administration gave <br />apprO\'al to the plan of operating the Trinidad Reservoir. One million <br />dollar s has been aIloted for work this year and it is expected that this pro- <br />ject can be completed in two years. <br /> <br />The Frying Pan Arkansas project has proceeded rapidly and some parts <br />are nearing completion. This project imports 70,000 a.f. of water from <br />Western slope but is expected to re-regulate native waters of the Arkansas <br />at the Pueblo Reservoir. Re-regulation would mean storing and conserving <br />some water now used for winter irrigation b.f up-stream ditches. It is not <br />supposed to store water that would normally reach John 11artin Reservoir. <br /> <br />Preliminary releases of Engineering studie s authorized by the Legisla- <br />ture of water, both surface and ground, in the Arkansas Basin would indicate <br />that some drastic changes in administration might be recommended. Charges <br />are prevalent that available ground water is not used effectively and that <br />surface water is not effective),)' or economically administrated, and that <br />water is wasted by winter irrigation. <br /> <br />Irrigators below John Martin are sometimes accused by up stream <br />users of calling for more water than necessar.)', and winter irrigation up <br />stream has often times nullified winter storage both in John Martin and <br />other Reservoirs. <br /> <br />'1 <br /> <br />One remedy suggested would be to shift second teet priorities to an <br />acre Coot system. !\luch of this on the theor;,r that w'1.ter could be delivered <br />in the proper quantity when needed if controlled by a Central Local Authority. <br /> <br />These questions will be considered and debated many times before the <br />1969 session of LegiSlature at which time we can be sure some effort will be <br />made to change the pre sent system of cubic Coot per second prioritif"s. <br /> <br />The V. S. Army Corps of Engineers have released their flood control <br />plan for the area west of John Martin Darn. This consists mainly of straight- <br />ening and channelizing the river so as to confine floods and deepening to <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />