My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03660
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03660
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:51:30 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:53:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.21
Description
UCRBRIP Hatchery Facilities
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/1/1996
Author
Tom Mandis & Neal Wa
Title
Feasibility of a Squawfish Facility at the Colorado-Ute Powerplant at Craig, Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />JULY 1986 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />FEASIBILITY OF A SQUAWFISH FACILITY <br />AT THE COLORADO-UTE POWERPLANT <br /> <br />AT CRAIG, COLORADO <br /> <br />Tom Mandis and Neal Ward <br /> <br />The location of a hatchery and rearing facility at this site h~s both <br />possibilities and problems. Most of the ponds would be unsuitable 'ijue to <br />chemical contamination. An old water treatment plant and pond are available <br />but they are considerable distance from any hot water. They probably should <br />not be considered in the early planning stages. <br /> <br />The vacant construction buildings close to the plant offer the best option <br />to start with. They could easily hold six circular tanks (8-ft diam) and four <br />40-ft portable raceways (see diagrams). Having all the fish inside the <br />buildings would offer several advantages: <br /> <br />1. Security <br />2. Better disease control <br />3. Better control over water quality <br />4. Better control over the fish <br /> <br />Being wild fish, there will be some of the squawfish that grow faster than <br />others due to the fact that they are more aggressive. It is when you have a <br />large variation in size that cannibi1ism becomes a serious problem. By having <br />the fish inside you could keep then sorted as to size and cut down on this <br />considerably. It would be a good idea to have three or four small circular <br />tanks to raise the fish in from hatch to swim-up. It is during this 3-6 day <br />* time period that bunching occurs and a lot of the fish smother. I believe a <br />circular tank with a slight current would help alleviate this problem. <br />Starting the swim-up fish on feed will have to be examined. At Dexter NFH and <br />Willow Beach in the past they have been put into tanks or ponds with <br />plankton. This may be difficult at the Craig location. There are feeds on <br />the market that the fish should accept. Also, they ha~e had some success <br />starting them on brine shrimp (Roger Hammond, pers. comm.). <br /> <br />Basic Criteria For Rearing Squawfish: <br /> <br />l. Water temperatures -- This seems to be more important than photoperiod f9r <br />spawning. Temperatures around 70-72 F are ideal. /This unit will have <br />water to 75 if necessary. <br /> <br />2. Water quality -- It is known that squawfish have tolerated low oxygen <br />levels for a length of time. As with any fish though, the less stress put <br />on them, the better they will do. The water at this unit will be both <br />heated and pumped at high pressure. These conditions are conducive to low <br />oxygens and high nitrogen gas. We will have to be prepared with aerators <br />and packed columns to combat this if necessary. Should try to keep oxygen <br />levels at 6 ppm or above. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.