My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03626
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03626
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:51:19 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:53:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
1/30/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #7
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />146 <br /> <br />146 <br /> <br />Next, I came in here, not prepared to present the matter with. a <br /> <br />full statement, giving it as my own vie'lpoint from my own state. <br /> <br />I feel frankly..that this is a matter requiring very prudent an~ <br />thoughtful ,treatlllent.Hasty treatment would be unvIarranted. vie <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />are here with a pretty sac.rec1 trust and it should not be treated. <br /> <br />lightly. . I really believe that in the months and weekstoaome.. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />many small matters of difference can be argue~ out. I wO)lI~say <br />frankly that I would be open to severo censure if I should go . <br />, , <br /> <br />home saying that I signed anything without the ,fullest and most <br /> <br />frank understanding with the officials and the government of my <br /> <br />State. <br /> <br />MR. HOOVER: I am only groping around here fora useful subject <br /> <br />for further consideration at the next meeting. In the meantime I <br /> <br /> <br />assume that Nevada, Oalifornia,Wyoming, and New Mexico, have a <br /> <br />sufficiency of data on which they are prepared to aot but that <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Utah, Ooloradoand Arizona have not sufficient data. That will <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />require certain periods of. time. I do not assume that we could <br /> <br />do all those things in even sixty days. How Il1Uch time do you <br /> <br />think will be. required, Mr. Oaldwell, on your part? <br />MR. OALDHE1L: How long didit take Colorado? <br /> <br />}iR. CARPENTER: It took us the better part of two seasons to <br /> <br />gather that ,data in the thoroughness with which it is gathered. <br />MR. HOOVER: Thehorne consideration of these proposals will <br />. " . <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br />probably require a month, .but I do no~ knO\'1 how many years the <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />collecti9n of further engineering data will take. <br />MR. DAVIS: I wan~ to Hithdraw in the meantime from the record <br />tha~New Mexico would accept any acreage less than the full amount <br />that is claimed. It does not seem to me that what vTe have split <br /> <br />W. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.