Laserfiche WebLink
<br />144 144 <br />our people would feel satisfied if we'met here and agreed to dis- <br />agree on the small amount of evidence that we have had presented <br />at this time. <br />MR. HOOVER: Might I just clear that point. I assume that your <br />idea is that Mr.. Carpenter's suggestion should be submitted to <br />Mr. Ma,C1ure's assocj..ates and get their re-acti6:tl. The,t is, to <br />dete:('!1line whethor they'do or do not agree to the unlimited uses <br />of the water'in the upper states. <br />MR. C.I\.1DvlEL1: I certainly would like to suggest that Mr. Nor- <br />vie1 and Mr. McClure do not take home to their States the idea <br />that they.met here commissioners unwil1ing'to' be generous and <br />helpful. <br />MR. MOCLURE: That is exactly the attitude ,Ie are getting. <br />MR. HOOVER: Perhaps you' can put it in the ,lay that it would <br />be desirable to consider this proposal of Mr. Carpenter's and get <br />the views of your ,own people. <br />MR. CALDvlEL1:' One of the first things I 'heard when I got here <br />"ias that the case was to be discusse.d on the data prepared by the <br />Reclamation Service. I believe that the upper states have met <br />pretty thoroughly that proposition. He are all uncertain as to <br />the way in which' the acreage wS:sarrive at, etc. Hr. Davis has <br />himself pretty thoroughly canvassed the situation in California. <br />Mr. Davis stands high ,in the estimation of the people of Californ- <br />ia. I believe Mr. Davis could get before the people of California <br />and a~vise them that they have nothing to fear as to their irri- <br />gation interests in the lower parts of the river from permitting <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br />.. <br /> <br />1,1. <br />