Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />~.'" <br />o <br />'~~ <br />o <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />ANTICIPATED EFFECTS OF ADlJITIOr,AL DEVELOPMENTS (continued) <br /> <br />back to the system in the sallie reach where they are diverted. The div~rted <br />water for the Dolores Project will not return to the Dolores River from <br />which it will be diverted. Katiler the return flows will flow into the San <br />Juan River above the gage at Bluff, Utah. Flows diverted from the San Juan <br />River above Archuleta for the Navajo Indian Irrigation Project do not <br />return to the river above the the gage at Archuleta, but return to the <br />river above the gage at Bluff, Utah. The additional salts brought in with <br />theRe return flows would be those picked up from the np.w lands that are <br />irrigated plus the salts originally in tile water diverted. <br /> <br />14. Between Green River at Green River, Utah, ~an Rafael Kiver near <br />Green River, Utah, Colorado River near Cisco, Utah, San Juan~ver <br />near Bluff, Utah, and Colorado River at Lees Ferry, Arizona <br /> <br />Navajo Powerplant. About 34,000 acre-feet (42 x 106,,)) will be used <br />in that portion of Arizona wi thin the Upper Basin by 1990 and would be <br />diverted above Lees Ferry. It is expected that the salt will be depleted <br />with the water. No additional water depletions are expected beyond 1990 <br />but due to increased concentrations, additional salts will be depleted. <br /> <br />Other Municipal Uses in Arizona. Of the Upper Colorado River Com- <br />pact's allocateci 50,000 acre-feet (62 x 106m3) to Arizona from the Upper <br />Colorado River systerr., about 13,000 acre-feet 06 x llJbm3) is presently <br />being uRed. Besides the 34,000 acre-feet (42 x 10bm3) to tne Navajo <br />Powerplant, additional municipal uses are expected to consume the remaining <br />3,000 acre-feet (4 x 106m3). <br /> <br />Mill Creek Project, Utah. About 1,000 acre-teet 0.2 x 100m3) of <br />will be depleted for municipal and industrial purposes and about <br />acre-feet 0.9 x 106m3) for irrigation. The project is expected <br />completed during 1~81. <br /> <br />water <br />1,500 <br />to be <br /> <br />15. <br /> <br />Above the Virgin River at Littlefield, Arizona <br /> <br />Dixie Project, Utah. The authorized Dixie Project was under con- <br />tract negotiations between the Washington County \Jater Conservancy District <br />and the Water and Poltier Resources Service during 1973. At a meeting on <br />February 8, 1973, it was announced by the District that they desired to <br />cease ne~otiations and not continue with the project. <br /> <br />Warner Valley, Utah. The Washington County Water Conservancy District <br />and the city of St. George have engaged in studies to cunstruct a smaller <br />dam and reservoir at Warner Valley, a fonner Dixie Project damsite. There <br />are plans for the construction of a reservoir with a capacity of 55 000 <br />acre-feet (68 x 106m3) for the storage of 10,000 acre-feet (12 x 106m3) <br />of water to be used for cooling purposes for a 500 megawatt coal fired <br />powerplant and 45,000 acre-feet (56 x 106m3) for future municipal and in- <br />dustrial demand aud supplemental irrigation water. Nevada Power would <br />utilize 375 megawatts and the city of St. George would utilize 125 mega- <br />watts at some time in the future. The powerplants would receive coal <br /> <br />54 <br />