My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03570
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03570
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:51:06 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:49:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.33.K
Description
15-Mile Reach (UCRBRIP)
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1995
Author
Leonard Rice
Title
Palisade/Grand Junciton Stream Flow Analyses Update for 1994 Data
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />USFWS - Palisade/Grand Junction Stream Flow Analyses - DRAFT <br />May 12, 1995 <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />Mid Noyember 1991 - We believe the drop in calculated local inflow to be caused by <br />operations of the Grand VaHey Project at the end of the irrigation season, and high flows <br />outside the 1991 rating curve. <br /> <br />October 31, 1992 - Calculations indicate no local inflow even though surrounding days <br />have local inflows of about 300 cfs. We believe an underestimation of the 27.5 Rd Gage <br />. flows was caused by flows outside the range of the defined staff discharge curve (2,800 <br />cfs vs. 2,100 cfs). <br /> <br />November 19, 1992 - The local inflows on this day were approximately 90 cfs less than <br />the local inflows on surrounding days. The total flow at the 27.5 Gage also took about <br />a 90 cfs drop when compared to the Palisade gage flow. Since there is little, if any <br />opportunity for drop in the critical reach, gaging equipment failure is suspected. We <br />suspect the Palisade gage because the Government Highline Canal on November 19th, <br />according to Bill Klapwyck (1993), began to build up reservoir storage behind the Cameo <br />roHer dam for power deliveries which should have caused a drop in the recorded Palisade <br />Gage flows as was seen in the 27,5 Rd Gage flows. <br /> <br />December 19-28, 1992 - The 27.5 Rd Gage was reported to have been affected by bank <br />ice in the later part of December. <br /> <br />August 1-2, 1993 - Calculations indicate no local inflow which we believe was caused by <br />underestimating the 27.5 Rd Gage flows because recorded flows were outside the range <br />of the defined staff discharge curve (2,700 cfs vs. 2,300 cfs). <br /> <br />August 24-27, 1993 - Calculations indicate local inflows at 350 on August 24 and then <br />down to 90 cfs on the 27th. We believe this fluctuation is due to precipitation and routing <br />of the storm hydrograph between the gages. See section Diversion Dam Operations <br />versus Local Inflow for further explanation. <br /> <br />November 10, 1993 - Calculated local inflow shows a major drop similar to that shown <br />in 1991. Again we believe the cause of this to be operation of the Grand Valley Project <br />and high flows outside the 1993 rating curve. <br /> <br />November 23, 1993 - This major dip is believed 'caused by the operation of the Grand <br />VaHey Project when it began winter power diversions, <br /> <br />Late December 1993 - Its believed the cause for zero calculated local inflows during this <br />period is icing problems experienced at the 27.5 Rd Gage. <br /> <br />November 7, 1994 - This major dip coincides with the day that the Grand VaHey Canal <br />stopped diverting irrigation water. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.