<br />000921
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />Carhart's "1922" report, For example, a letter from the Washington Office to Region 9,
<br />written in 1955 stated: "We have the original copy of Mr, Arthur Carhart's report entitled
<br />'Recreation Plan, Superior National Forest' submitted May, 1922 and approved by District
<br />Forester Peck on November 8, 1922,"52 That statement, in itself, constitutes irrevocable
<br />evidence that Carhart's plan was formally approved two years before the one proposed by
<br />Aldo Leopold. Leopold's plan for the Gila National Forest was not formally approved until
<br />June 3, 1924,53
<br />
<br />Carhart's 1919 and 1921 reports regarding the Superior, after some seven to nine years
<br />of seeming to be dormant, had in reality remained quite alive. They had stood the test of
<br />time. A letter to Carhart from the Assistant District Forester, District 2, in Denver, dated
<br />February 23, 1928, brought out this point:
<br />
<br />Contrary to your impression, the recreation plan you conceived for the Superior has not been
<br />allowed to accumulate dust but rather has been a very live document and as time has gone by has
<br />formed the basis for the preparation of the controlling plan governing recreation and other activities
<br />within that Forest. While the wording in that plan may not be identical with that used by you, yet
<br />the fundamental policies are the same, which I presume will be the source of some satisfaction to
<br />you. . . . I believe our present plan provides for the utmost in coordinated use and tor the ultimate
<br />development for the most attractive recreation ground that will meet with your ideas, to a large
<br />Bl<tent, of the full capitalization of the social value of a Forest of this character.54
<br />
<br />~
<br />'I
<br />i
<br />
<br />Moreover, in the report of the forester for the year 1928, newlv-aooointed Chief Forester
<br />R. y, Stuart remarked that "the study of the so-called 'wilderness areas' or areas believed to
<br />be most useful if retained in a condition of relative undevelopment, continued throughout
<br />the year, and in one district was completed,"55
<br />
<br />~
<br />~ I
<br />
<br />The foregoing reference to the study of the so,called "wilderness areas" that had
<br />continued throughout the year, and that "in one district was completed," failed to state
<br />that an area or areas had been established or designated, To that year, 1928, the only area
<br />which had come to the attention of the Washington Office of the Forest Service and to the
<br />Secretary of Agriculture had been the border lake country in the Superior National Forest,
<br />Acting Forester Sherman had approved the recreation plan for the Superior National Forest,
<br />June 30, 1926, and that plan was given final approval by Secretary of Agriculture Jardine on
<br />September 17, 1926,56 The files of the Gila National Forest, District 3, Albuquerque, New
<br />Mexico, reflected no coordination with the Washington Office of the Secretary of
<br />Agriculture between 1924 and 1928 concerning the "wilderness area" in that Forest,57
<br />
<br />:,
<br />Ii
<br />
<br />'.
<br />"
<br />
<br />The movement to establish wilderness areas which began in District 2 during mid-1919
<br />had come to the attention of Assistant District Forester Leopold, District 3, in that year,
<br />Again in the late summer of 1921 while Carhart was still writing his plan of management for
<br />the Superior National Forest, Leopold visited the Denver District Office of the Forest
<br />Service and the two men talked for several hours about wilderness preservation in National
<br />Forests. Yet it was not until late 1921 that Leopold began writing on this subject,58 His
<br />first article dealing with the wilderness concept was published in November 1921. There
<br />followed a hiatus of four years, His next published articles on the subject of the wilderness
<br />
<br />"
<br />"
<br />:1
<br />
<br />8
<br />
|