My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03464
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03464
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:50:32 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:45:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.300.31.J
Description
San Juan River - Environmental Studies
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
5/12/1995
Title
Biological Evaluation of a Proposal to Stock Non-Native Fishes into Ponds within the 0- to 50-year Floodplain of the Upper Colorado River Basin in Critical Habitat of Endangered Fishes
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o <br />r:'i' <br />c." <br />N <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />;.[::>. <br /> <br />Four big-river fishes of the Colorado River have been listed <br />by the D,S. Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS) as endangered: <br />Colorado squawfish (Ptychocheilus lucius), razorback sucker <br />(Xyrauchen texanus), humpback chub (Gila cypha) , and bony tail <br />chub [Gila elegans) . Numerous recovery and implementation plans <br />have been written, well over 100 scientific papers have been <br />published, and millions of dollars have been spent, all toward <br />the recovery of these four endangered species. Most of the <br />critical threats to these four species center around loss of <br />habitat. and include: instream flow, non-native fish predation <br />and competition, and macro- and micro-habitat availability and <br />utilization, <br /> <br />Recovery efforts for the Colorado River fishes have been <br />divided geographically into Upper Basin and Lower Basin due to <br />differences in remaining habitats and stocks. The recovery' <br />program for the endangered fishes of the Upper Colorado Basin is <br />centered in FWS in Denver, Colorado. FWS personnel work in <br />conjunction with Colorado Division of Wildlife, Utah Division of <br />Wildlife Resources, wyoming Game and Fish Department, and a <br />multitude of private, state, and federal organizations toward the <br />eventual re-establishment of self-sustaining populations of the <br />four fishes while providing for future water development. <br /> <br />Numerous nonnative fishes have been implicated in impacting <br />endangered fishes in the Upper Basin. The most detrimental is <br />thought to be channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), which <br />dominates the upper Colorado and Green rivers and their <br />tributaries, and reproduces within the mainstream. Other <br />nonnative fishes believed to be detrimental include: green <br />sunfish (Lepomis cyanelllus), fathead minnow (Pimephales <br />promelas), red shiner (Cyprinella lutrensis), common carp <br />(Cyprinus carpio), redside shiner (Richardsonius balteatus), <br />northern pike (Esox lucius) , mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis), and <br />largemouth bass. Biologists familiar with these rivers and <br />fishes suggest that many of these species do not maintain <br />breeding populations within the mainstream, and their presence <br />depends upon continuous immigration from off-river ponds during <br />relatively frequent flooding. Black crappie are within the <br />watershed, but are not known to have been taken from the <br />mainstream rivers or their riverine tributaries, <br /> <br />Recently, Colorado Division of Wildlife (DOW) has proposed <br />to stock nonnative game fishes into ponds within the floodplain <br />of the Colorado River in Colorado, including largemouth bass <br />(Micropterus salmoides), bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus), and <br />black crappie (pomoxis nigromaculatus). All three of these non- <br />native fishes are piscivorous, which raises concern over their <br />movement into the Colorado River and subsequent impact on the <br />endangered fishes there. FWS has discussed the proposal with <br />DOW, the neighboring states, and cooperating agencies, and has <br />begun to consider ideas that could provide for both the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.