Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6. Paradox Deep Well. <br /> <br />For this alternative, a cut off wall would be located just downstream of <br />the seep emergence area. From there sallne water would be transported by <br />pipeline to Paradox Valley, where it would be included with the Paradox <br />brine for injection in the deep wells of the Paradox Valley Unit, Colorado <br />River Basin Salinity Control Project. <br /> <br />Construction would take about 2 years. <br /> <br /> <br />PARADOX <br />DEE P WELL <br />ALTERNATIVE <br />#6 <br /> <br />Plant <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />x\: <br />.... <br />"0 <br />"'... <br />o <br />... <br />I <br /> <br />NATURITA_ <br /> <br />OC2198 <br /> <br />Alternative Cost Comparisons and Effect <br /> <br />Table 1 compares the diversion capacities in terms of average salt loading and <br />net effect at Imperial Dam using the Colorado River Equation for 1990. <br /> <br />Tables 2, 3, and 4 present an appraisal cost comparison of the alternatives. <br />Each is evaluated at three diversion capacities, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 cfs. Based <br />on 2 years of discharge data for Salt Creek, 90% of the time flow averaged 0.3 <br />cfs or less. Flo\~ were seldom less than 0.1 cfs. <br /> <br />Table 5 presents a comparison of alternative statistics again under the three <br />diversion capacities. <br /> <br />7 <br />