Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />2987 <br />estlma ted at <br />Provision of <br />diversion of <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />100,000 acre-feet, or a difference of 50,000 acre-feet. <br />this additional capacity would be a charge against complete <br />Bijou. <br /> <br />2. Question: Due to the fact that Bijou Creek waters contain much <br />sediment, it is important to know how these waters will be handled. <br /> <br />Arlswer: See answer 1 above. <br /> <br />SECTION FIVE <br />1~~OELECTaIC POWER <br /> <br />1. Question: Among the purposes for which the Narrows Dam is to <br />be constructed is the possible production of hydroelectric power. What <br />studies and what informetion is now evailable concerning tIlis phase of <br />the construction? <br /> <br />Answer: The Kegional Counsel has rendered an opinion that con- <br />struction-or-a-hydroelectric pawerplant at Narrows is not at prese~t <br />authorized and that, if such construction is to be ,~.dertaken, further <br />ConEressional action will be required as it constitutes a change in pur- <br />pose,from that outlined in Senate uocument 191, 78th Congress, 2nd <br />Session. However, the possibilities of such construction are being ex- <br />plored and cost estimates are being made for two differently sized <br />plants. The only structural difference in the design of the d~~ ar-d <br />appurtenant wor~<s which would be required for installation of a pOVfer- <br />plant would be the arrangen~nt of the river outlet to insure that t~6 <br />design would be adaptable to the inclusion of a pcrwer~lant at seme <br />future time. It wO'lld be very short-sighted on the pal't of tree Govern- <br />m.ent not tv insure such provision if it cun be made at no great increase <br />in cost. <br /> <br />2. <br />electric <br /> <br />Question: Does the J)ur2au anticipate that reasonably priced <br />power c.ould be prod1..:.ced ill such a project as the one pro?osed? <br /> <br />Answer: In any analysis of a proposed hydroelectric develop- <br />ment, construction costs wtich must be allocated to power are first <br />determined. This construction cost is th8n reduced to an annual paymeDt <br />which must be made to retire the construction cost allocated to power, <br />plus interest OD the unpnid balance at three percent in ~ 50-year period. <br />To this annual construction charge must be added an allowance for re- <br />placement sufficient in amount to maintain the plant in top operating <br />condition. T;~e estimated annnal ccst of operation a.nd rr,aintenance is <br />also added. The StlID of these factors is then the total annual charge <br />which the pawerplant must te capable of paying. The amount of energy <br />which the plant is capable of generating is computed and segregated into <br />classes of power such ns firm, secondary, or fuel replacement. The <br />amount of energy which can b" produced, properly weighted according: to <br />cl~ss, is then compared to the total annual charge which the plant must <br />earn to determine the rates at which electricity must be sold in order <br />to return the annual charge. If the rates thus determined nre not con- <br />sidered competitive within the power market area, the plant, of course, <br /> <br />12 <br />