My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03343
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03343
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:49:53 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:40:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8507
Description
Rio Grande Project
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Date
1/1/1995
Title
Rio Grande Study Section 2 & 3
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />September <br />October <br />November <br />December <br /> <br />3,270 <br />1,090 <br />540 <br />o <br /> <br />Annual Total <br /> <br />60,000 <br /> <br />In the event that "extraordinary droughf or "serious accident to the irrigation system in the <br />United States" occurs, the water delivered to Mexico can be reduced in the same proportion as <br />the water delivered to the irrigated lands in the United States is reduced. Extraordinary drought <br />and serious accident are not defined in the treaty. <br /> <br />Article III provides that water will be delivered to Mexico without cost. The United States, <br />consequently, is responsible for the storage, conveyance, and measurement. <br /> <br />In Article IV, Mexico waived any claims for waters in the Rio Grande between the head <br />of the Acequia Madre and Fort Quitman and also settled all prior and subsequent claims for <br />damages as the result of diversion of Rio Grande waters by United States' citizens. <br /> <br />Rio Grande ComDact of 1938 <br /> <br />Interstate Controversies Leadina to the ComDact. The interstate controversies that <br />existed in the upper Rio Grande basin from the 1890s until the late 1930s initially involved <br />Colorado's desire to construct storage reservoirs and the fear of the downstream interests that <br />such reservoirs would deplete the flow of the river. As previously mentioned, the development <br />of any significant reservoir storage was prevented by the embargo of 1896 since any such <br />development would involve Federal land. In Colorado's view, this situation was not equitable. <br />Colorado's major irrigation development had occurred by 1890 and reservoir storage facilities <br />were necessary to regulate the water supply that was already being used so that it could be <br />made available over time to match the crop irrigation requirements.2J In contrast, the major <br />irrigation development had occurred in the Rio Grande Project area in the 1910s after the <br /> <br />2j Approximately two-thirds of the total irrigation season water supply on the Rio Grande in the San Luis <br />Valley occurs during May and June. Substantially more than one-half of the irrigation requirements occur <br />after June. <br /> <br />3-6 <br /> <br />(':: ...,. n <br />'j \. . I....J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.