Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br />OOlS:i <br />Affected Environrnent & Consequences <br /> <br />3-5 <br /> <br />Tables 3-2 through 3-8 show the mean monthly flows at various locations along the <br />Uncompahgre River for the No Action (Alternative A) and with Project alternatives (E-l, <br />E-2, and E-3), For Alternative E-l, the maximum flow through the proposed hydropower <br />plant would be 950 cfs; for alternatives E-2, and E-3, rnaximum flow through the <br />proposed plant would be 850 and 750 cfs, respectively. <br /> <br />Table 3.2. Average Flow in Uncompahgre River below South Canal (cfs) <br /> <br /> Alternative <br />Month A E-1 E-2 E-3 <br />Ian 99 99 99 99 <br />Feb 95 95 95 95 <br />Mar 203 142 142 142 <br />Apr 797 398 398 398 <br />May 1117 641 641 641 <br />Iun 1230 751 751 751 <br />Iul 1239 740 740 740 <br />Aug 1025 602 602 602 <br />Sep 796 442 442 442 <br />Oct 461 235 235 235 <br />Nov 108 103 103 103 <br />Dec 92 92 92 92 <br />Annual 379 362 362 362 <br /> <br />Table 3-3. Average Flow in Uncompahgre River above Montrose (cfs) <br /> <br /> Alternative <br />Month A E-1 E-2 E-3 <br />Ian 79 79 79 79 <br />Feb 74 74 74 74 <br />Mar 91 29 29 29 <br />Apr 433 64 64 64 <br />May 589 149 149 149 <br />Iun 655 224 224 224 <br />Iul 618 158 158 158 <br />Aug 473 77 77 77 <br />Sep 374 60 60 60 <br />Oct 240 44 44 44 <br />Nov 91 49 49 49 <br />Dec 80 80 80 80 <br />Annual 317 90 90 90 <br /> <br />AS Lateral Hydropower Project <br /> <br />July 2000 <br /> <br />. . d_1_ <br /> <br />. ..,'. , <br /> <br />~ ~-)! <br />-~ . <~ <br />'" ". '"'",""~".....~~ <br />