My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03310
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03310
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:49:41 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:39:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.200
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - Development and History - UCRB 13a Assessment
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
8/13/1979
Title
WRC Study - Draft Summary Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~[1) <br /> <br />~~}:; ~ <br /> <br />'(-~::) <br /> <br />N <br />CXl <br />~ <br />00 <br /> <br />In addition to serving as sources of water supply for a variety of <br />consumptive uses, many nonconsumptive, instream uses are made of the <br />rivers of the Upper Basin. These include direct.contact recreational <br />pursuits (e.g., fishing, kayaking, rafting, and tubing), as well as other <br />activities which are enhanced by the presence of a stream (e.g., hiking, <br />picnicking, and camping). Ecological values are also associated with a <br />stream environment, as, for example, in the habitat they provide for <br />nongame species of fish. <br /> <br />With respect to direct contact recreational activities, it is esti- <br />mated that .over 325,000 activity days of use occurred in 1976 on the main <br />stems of the larger rivers in the Upper Basin. While data is largely <br />unavailable as to the level of use on smaller tributaries (almost all of <br />which use would be for. fishing), it is clear that total recreational use <br />in the Upper Basin is substantially greater than the above-cited figure. <br /> <br />Given the depletions which occur under present (1975-l976) condi- <br />tions of development and the effects of the numerous reservoirs which have <br />been built in the Upper Basin,l the annual amount and monthly distribution <br />of stream flows have been substantially altered from what they naturally <br />would have been. The resulting hydrologic regime has been characterized <br />by estimating the distribution of flows which would occur over the long run <br />if present conditions of development and reservoir regulation were to re- <br />main unchanged for several decades (see table 3.4). Put another way, the <br />hydrologic regime has been depicted in the "steady state," or equilibrium, <br />condition to which it would come over the long run. <br /> <br />With respect to reservoir content in the "steady state" condition, <br />it is estimated that the mean active content of Blue Mesa, Morrow Point, <br />.Flaming Gorge, and Lake Powell. reservoirs would be ab~ut 85 to 90 percent <br />of their combined maximum live storage. Annual evaporation from the eRSP <br />reservoirs would average about 665,000 acre-feet, bringing total average <br />annual Upper Basin depletions to 3.8 msf. <br /> <br />It is important to note that the above-described "steady .state" <br />conditions are premised upon natural flow estimates for the period 1906- <br />1974, which'natural flows averaged 15.2 maf per year at Lees Ferry. If <br />the period 1930-1974 is used, with estimated average natural flows at Lees <br />Ferry of 13.8 maf per year (see fig. 3.1), the resulting characterization <br />of the hydrologic.regime changes quite a bit. For example, the <br /> <br />1. There are over 30 reservoirs in the Upper Basin, the maximum live <br />storage of which totals 34.5 maf. Of this, the ca5P reservoirs account <br />for 29.7 maf. <br /> <br />xxi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.