My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03308
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03308
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:49:41 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:39:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.105.I
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Navajo-Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/26/2004
Title
Navajo Dam EIS-Draft Bio Opinion-US Fish and Wildlife Service New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Area Manager <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />Lake Powell is populated by several fish species not native to the Colorado River that are <br />predators on native fish. As mentioned earlier, larval native fish that drift into Lake Powell are <br />aimOSI certainiy iost to predaiiun by laIgtanuuth bass, smalL-nout; bCi3S, y...alleye, or crappie <br />(Pomoxis sp.). Among the species present is striped bass (Marone saxatilis), which migrates up <br />the San Juan River to spawn. It has been found as far upstream as the PNM weir (RM 166) <br />(Davis 2003). Adult striped bass are piscivorous (Moyle 1976). In 2000, 432 striped bass were <br />captured during monitoring trips for pikeminnow and during trips to remove non-native fishes <br />(Davis 2003). The contents of 38 stomachs were analyzed and native suckers were found in 41 <br />percent (Davis 2003). This migratory predator is a threat to larval and juvenile native fish. <br /> <br />Changes in the timing and magnitude of flows <br /> <br />Typical of rivers in the Southwest, the San Juan was originally characterized by large spring <br />snowmelt peak flows, low summer and winter base flows, and high-magnitude, short-duration <br />summer and fall storm events (Holden 1999) (Figure 2). Historically, flows in the San Juan <br />River were highly variable and ranged from a low of 44 cfs in September 1956, to a high of <br />19,790 cfs in May 194J (mean monthly values) at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Station <br />gauge near Shiprock, New Mexico. The lowest mean monthly flow at Shiprock after Navajo <br />Dam was filled was 213 cfs (August 1978) and the highest mean monthly flow was 9,508 (June <br />1979), a decrease of over] 0,000 cfs compared to pre-dam years. For the 40 years of record post- <br />dam, the highest spring peak flow (daily mean) recorded at the USGS gauge at Bluff, Utah, was <br />15,200 cfs (May 30, 1979). For the 49 years of record prior to Navajo Dam a peak spring flow <br />greater than 15,200 cfs occurred 13 times (25 percent of the time). The highest spring peak flow <br />recorded (daily mean) was 52,000 cfs (June 30, 1927). Flows from the Animas River (the largest <br />tributary downstream of Navajo Dam) are rarely above 10,000 cfs. Since 1914, the highest daily <br />mean peak flow recorded was] 1,000 cfs (June] 9, ] 949) and spring flows over 10,000 cfs <br />occurred in only 2 other years. The maximum release from Navajo Dam is 5,000 cfs. Although <br />there are additional tributaries downstream that contribute water to the San Juan, it is clear that <br />peak flows will never reach the magnitude that they once did. <br /> <br />The completion of Navajo Dam and subsequent dam operations altered the natural hydro graph of <br />the San Juan River substantially (Holden 1999). There was an appreciable reduction in the <br />magnitude and change in timing of the annual spring peak. In wet years, dam releases began <br />early to create space in the reservoir to store runoff (Holden ] 999). The peak discharge averaged <br />54 percent of the spring peak of pre-dam years. Base flows were substantially elevated in <br />comparison to pre-dam years. The median monthly flow for the base flow months (August- <br />February) averaged 168 percent of the pre-dam period (Holden 1999). Minimum flows were <br />elevated and periods of near-zero flow were eliminated with a minimum monthly flow during <br />base-flow periods of250 cfs compared to 65 cfs for the pre-dam period (Holden 1999). The <br />hydrograph became much flatter during this period oftime (Figure 2). From 1992 to 1997 <br />(research period) and continuing today, a more natural hydrograph has been maintained but as <br />described in the previous paragraph, peak magnitudes cannot be matched because of outlet <br />restrictions at the dam (Figure 2). In addition the total amount of water available to the river is <br />reduced due to depletions (discussed below). <br /> <br />OOlH2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.