Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Area Manager <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />39 <br /> <br />summer 2002 were recaptured upstream of the structure in summer and fall, 2002 (Jason Davis, <br />Service, pers.comm., 2002). Channel catfish is one of the weaker-swimming fish species found <br />in the San Juan River. Therefore, it is highly likely that pikeminnow, razorback sucker, and <br />other native fishes can negotiate the ladder. We believe the removal ofCudei Diversion and <br />installation of the fish ladder at Hogback Diversion improved access for native fishes over a 24.5 <br />mile reach of river. <br /> <br />Until 2003, the PNM weir (RM 166) was also a barrier to fish passage. With the completion of <br />the PNM selective fish ladder in 2003, passage is now possible past that structure. Between June <br />and December 2003, 17,394 native fish used the passage including 9 pikeminnow and 4 <br />razorback suckers (Albert LaPabie, Najavo Fish and Wildlife, unpublished report 2003). <br />However, the Four Corners Power Plant (Arizona Public Service) Diversion at RM 163.3 can act <br />as a fish barrier when the control gate for the structure is closed (Masslich and Holden 1996). <br />Above the PNM weir, the Fruitland Irrigation Canal Diversion (RM 178.5) may block <br />pikeminnow access during flows less than 2,000 cfs (typical for July-September). Fish may pass <br />through a sluiceway during higher flows and during the winter at low flows when the sluice gates <br />are left open (Masslich and Holden 1996). <br /> <br />Transformation of riverine into lake habitat <br /> <br />Lake Powell inundated the lower 87 km (54 mi) of the San Juan River and Navajo Reservoir <br />inundated another 43 km (27 mil. The two reservoirs reduced the potential range and habitat for <br />the two endangered fishes from about 523 km (325 mi) to 362 km (225 mi) and inundated <br />potential pikeminnow spawning areas in the upper San Juan River (Holden 2000). Although the <br />loss of habitat is substantial, several other problems for native fishes resulted from the creation of <br />lakes. The larvae of razorback sucker and pikeminnow drift downstream until they find suitable <br />nursery habitat (backwaters or other low velocity areas) (Holden 2000). Because the river has <br />been truncated 87 km (54 mi) on the lower end, there are many fewer stream miles available for <br />nursery habitat. Some pikeminnow in the Green and Colorado River systems drift up to 322 km <br />(200 mi) from spawning areas before finding nursery habitat, even though some used nursery <br />areas are only a few rniles below the spawning areas (Tranunel and Chart 1999). The majority of <br />YOY pikeminnow that have been collected in the San Juan River have been at the inflow to Lake <br />Powell (Buntjer et al. 1994, Lashmett 1994, Archer et al. 1995, Platania 1995). Because of the <br />many predators present, it is unlikely that larvae survive in Lake Powell. <br /> <br />In 1961, prior to the filling of Navajo Dam, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish used <br />rotenone "to eliminate trash fish species" from the Pine River (24 km [15 miD, the Navajo River <br />(9.6 km [6 miD, and the San Juan River (120 km [75 miJ) (Olson 1962). Fourteen species offish <br />were eliminated (Olson 1962). There were three drip stations on the San Juan that effectively <br />killed all fish from the state line, near Rosa, New Mexico, down to Fruitland, approximately 64 <br />km (40 mi) below Navajo Dam (Olson 1962). Included in the list offish eliminated was <br />pikeminnow (Olson 1962). The number offish killed was not recorded because of the large scale <br />of the project (Olson 1962). The intent of the project was to reduce (eliminate) competition and <br />predation between native fish and the non-native trout fishery that was to be established. <br />