Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CHAPTER II <br /> <br />GENERAL APPROACH TO THE WORK <br /> <br />National Environmental Policy Act <br /> <br />.~' <br />~" ,'-' <br />t~~ <br /> <br />The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is the basic National <br />charter for protection of the environment. It establishes policy, sets goals <br />and provides means for carrying out the policy. Section l02(2)(c) required <br />Federal agencies to act in accordance with the spirit of the law and to pre- <br />pare an environmental report on any major Federal action. The NEPA process is <br />intended to help public officials make informed decisions that are based on <br />understanding the potential environmental consequences. <br /> <br />The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) published regulations for <br />implementation of the act that set forth the directives to achieve the above <br />goal. These regulations, which took effect July 30, 1979 (published <br />November 29, 1978), stress concentration on truly significant environmental <br />issues rather than amassing of information. They also require early public <br />involvement, early availability of environmental information, and the con- <br />sideration of mitigation of environmental impacts. In addition, CEQ regula- <br />tions mandate a scoping process to help identify significant issues and a com- <br />parative analysis of all reasonable alternatives. Procedures, page limits, <br />and formats are also suggested. <br /> <br />Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act <br /> <br />Title II of the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act (Public Law <br />93-320) passed on June 24, 1974, directed the Secretary of the Interior to <br />implement a salinity control policy adopted for the Colorado River. The <br />policy essentially adopted the "Conclusions and Recommendations" published in <br />the Proceedings of the Reconvened Seventh Session of the Conference in the <br />Matter of Pollution of the Interstate Waters of the Colorado River and lts <br />Tributaries in the States of California, Colorado, Utah, Arizona, Nevada, New <br />Mexico, and Wyoming, held in Denver, Colorado, April 26-27, 1972, under the <br />authority of Section 10 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. <br />1160) and approved by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency <br />on June 9, 1972. The Secretary was further directed to expedite the investi- <br />gation, planning, and implementation of the salinity control program generally <br />as described in Chapter VI of the Secretary's report entitled, Colorado River <br />Water Quality Improvement Program, February 1972. He was further directed to <br />expedite completion of planning reports on l2 units. The Big Sandy River Unit <br />was included in the l2 named units (a thirteenth [Meeker Dome] was later <br />added) that required planning reports to be completed and submitted ,to the <br />Congress with the Secretary's recommendations. Feasibility level investiga- <br />tions for the Big Sandy River Unit and other Title II units were specifically <br />authorized by Public Law 96-375 (October 3, 1980). <br /> <br />:-,"'1:"-, <br />~, . :~' <br />""4-." <br /> <br />Fish and wildlife Coordination Act <br /> <br />The Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 40l as amended; 16 <br />U.S.C. 661 et seq.) requires Water and Power to consult with the Fish and <br />Wildlife Service early in the planning process on water resource development <br />projects which could impact fish and wildlife resources. The Fish and Wild- <br />life Service, in conjunction with the State wildlife resource agency, is <br />8 <br /> <br />......., <br />:",~-<.') <br />~J <br /> <br />O)lt82 <br />