|
<br />. .~..::.,;.::.;,'" '~"~:~,"j';::.x,<~;. .".. ~"'~..,':,j:..-,,';i '. .......;...,."';{;<e;,...~<-,,.:.. '''Z~ r~ . - .. ....-;::: :'_~~ .".:,;:;;.;.;..:P,.r,i:~;.
<br />"~'M,~",,~'.~-1t:~ _,-:.:~.~."-f:~~,~:..~~~/~.>.:,.~.~~~~~~:~.~~~:.~~:~~~~~~_t::~~~:~~~~-:..~~~~~~
<br />-"'Il" .
<br />1.1,1 h ('))G'~.I
<br />I o' ,0 J
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />.;"...-
<br />
<br />'l
<br />
<br />,
<br />i
<br />I
<br />!
<br />I
<br />
<br />I
<br />;;J'-
<br />..
<br />". .
<br />
<br />
<br />j
<br /><
<br />.;rot;
<br />'.,
<br />. .o::~ .
<br />_.h ~.
<br />~",,,\
<br />~-~
<br />, .
<br />
<br />""""
<br />
<br />i
<br />,
<br />
<br /><~
<br />-~
<br />,.<J
<br />
<br />1
<br />
<br />,~... ...
<br />.
<br />_~, A
<br />-,;....
<br />."
<br />
<br />
<br />-
<br />
<br />...-...i
<br />..It~"
<br />"'f~..
<br />. - ."
<br />--
<br />
<br />c. Nc.W' or additional structures would have to be in accordance with
<br /> , !'.
<br /> architectural nnd site plans approved by the Forest Service.
<br /> I
<br /> , ,)
<br />d. Exterior flashing lights and signs would not be pendtted. ;,.>'
<br />neon
<br />d. Advertising signs and billboards would be limited to one on-premise
<br /> sign per property and to desiBnat"d sien plazas.
<br />
<br />5. The administering accncy, in this case the Forest Service, could in-
<br />spect [or violations of the tel7..S o[ a scenic easement, but only
<br />after advance notice had been given to the landO\;ner.
<br />
<br />Acces9
<br />
<br />Question:
<br />
<br />Would public access to the river across prlv~c~'lan~ be a part of a
<br />scenic e~sement?
<br />
<br />In inst'lnc,"s ',!here access to the river ,,'ould be obtained from private
<br />landOl.mers, the pruJisions ."lUld be placed on the sa"'.e docur..ent with
<br />the scenic casel:lcnt. Access, however. would be separate consideration.
<br />
<br />Question:
<br />
<br />Would public access ,,~ needed across private lar;d to the river?
<br />
<br />Access to the riv~r could be provided acrons Federal or State lands 1n
<br />most instnnces. r:".:-':2 nre f:.....r locations T,..'her~ a ribht-of-T,JDY e.1,Scrr:ent
<br />could be n0eded across private l~nd. These are 10c3ted on tbe ~orth
<br />Fork in the vicinity o[ (1) the U. S. C~n~dian l'arder <lnd (2) Polebridge;
<br />and on the Middle For~ in the vicinity of (3) 81anke~ship Bridge and (4)
<br />the confluence o[ the South Fork.
<br />
<br />Question:
<br />
<br />Would access be needed across priv::te land for the .public to travel along
<br />the edge of the river?
<br />
<br />'--"
<br />
<br />..~\
<br />Right-of-way ea.e~ents would not be needed to allow the public to traverse!
<br />the shoreline. Ei.ghty-seven percent of the shoreline '-'ould be ,,1 thin '
<br />Federal or St~tc olffiersilip (open to public access) and Montana St3te LC!'.J
<br />(Montana Fish and Gar.le Lal.!, Section 26-337 and Section 26-338) provides f"
<br />the richt of the public to traverse the e,(ige of private land to fish.
<br />This access would be adcquate.
<br />
<br />-10-
<br />
<br />D
<br />
|