Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />, <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br />00 <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />3. Description of quantity and quality <br />of proposed discharge. <br /> <br />4. Description of how salts removed from <br />discharges shall be disposed of to <br />prevent their entering surface waters <br />or groundwater aquifers. <br /> <br />5. Technical feasibility of the <br />alternatives. <br /> <br />6. Total construction, operation and <br />maintenance costs and costs in <br />dollars per ton of salt removed from <br />the discharge. <br /> <br />7. Closure plans to ensure termination <br />of any proposed discharge at the end <br />of the economic life of the project. <br /> <br />8. A statement as to the one alternative <br />plan for reduction of salt discharge <br />that the applicant recommends be <br />adopted including an evaluation of <br />the technical, economic and legal <br />practicability of achieving no <br />discharge of salt. <br /> <br />9. Such other information as the permit- <br />ting authority may deem necessary. <br /> <br />IV. In determining whether a "no salt" discharge <br />is practicable the permit issuing authority <br />shall consider, but not be limited to, the <br />water rights and the technical, economic and <br />legal practicability of achieving no dis- <br />charge of sal t. <br /> <br />V. Where "no-sal t" discharge is determined not <br />to be practicable the permitting authority <br />shall, in determining permit conditions, <br />consider: <br /> <br />A. The impact of the total proposed salt <br />discharge of each alternative on the <br />lower mainstem in terms of both tons per <br />year and concentration. <br /> <br />B. Costs per ton of salt removed from the <br />discharge for each plan alternative. <br /> <br /> <br />-3- <br />