Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />c..n <br />~ <br />W <br /> <br />8-259297 <br /> <br />Results in Brief <br /> <br />From the program's inception through September 30, 1994, BOR, BLM, and <br />USDA had spent a total of about $362 million on title II salinity control <br />projects, and these agencies have plans to spend an additional <br />$430 million.! BOR had spent about $266 million on six salinity control <br />projects, primarily to line irrigation canals to eliminate water seepage. <br />Three of these projects were completed, and three were under <br />construction. BOR has four additional projects in various stages of <br />planning. BOR estimates it will need another $201 million for the three <br />unfInished and the four currently planned projects. BLM had spent about <br />$7 million on its salinity control program, which encompasses designated <br />salinity control projects as well as other land management activities <br />intended to controlsalinity and provide other benefIts, according to <br />program managers. BLM'S projects generally concentrate on reducing the <br />erosion of soil that has a high salt content. For fIscal year 1995, BLM <br />program managers expect to spend about $800,000 on salinity control. <br />USDA had spent about $89 million on about 1,300 contracts for salinity <br />control projects on farms in five project areas. Farmers voluntarily <br />participate in these projects to reduce water seepage through the use of <br />more effIcient irrigation methods. USDA program managers forecast that <br />they will spend about $228 million more to complete salinity control <br />activities in the five current project areas. <br /> <br />Several factors are considered in selecting a salinity control method from <br />the available alternatives. Key among these factors are the method's <br />effectiveness and cost. For example, to prevent seepage from an earthen <br />irrigation canal, agency officials might consider lining the canal with <br />plastic or cement, or replacing it with a pipe. If all three were equally <br />effective, agency officials explained, they would select the cheapest <br />method. Feasibility and the effect on the environment are other factors <br />considered when salinity control methods are selected. <br /> <br />Since 1974, according to Interior's salinity control measurements, the <br />program has been successful in meeting its goal of maintaining salinity <br />levels at or below the limits approved by the EPA under the Clean Water <br />Act. Without additional, new salinity control projects, according to BOR <br />data, salinity levels would exceed the established limits by about the year <br />2000 and would steadily increase thereafter. With completion of all <br />planned projects, BOR expects salinity levels to remain within the <br />established limits beyond the year 2010. <br /> <br />lExpenditures are actual outlays; we did not acljust them to reflect inflation because, in some cases, <br />year-to-year data were not readily available. <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />GAO/RCED-915-58 Salinity Control Projects in the Colorado River Basin <br />