My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03251
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03251
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:49:26 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:37:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.100.30
Description
CRSP
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/11/1964
Author
CWCB
Title
March 1964 CWCB Board Memo RE: CRSP
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />As can be seen from the foregoing analysis, the Parshall <br />unit has been a marginal project from the very outset. Develop- <br />ments in the intervening years since the preparation of the ori- <br />ginal status report have done nothing to improve the project. If <br />anything, the project appears to be infeasible at this time even <br />without considering conflicting claims of water rights. The project <br />lands average about 8,000 feet in elevation, the development cost <br />per acre is high, and the benefit-cost ratio is doubtful. The most <br />noteworthy aspect of the proposed project to date has been the <br />endless litigation which has revolved about. it. <br /> <br />It is obvious that the waters of the Williams Fork River <br />will be fully developed and utilized without any assistance from <br />either this Board or the federal government. Because of this fact, <br />the chances of ever getting the project authorized in Congress are <br />negligible. <br /> <br />For this and other reasons expressed herein, we recommend <br />that the Parshall Project, as an individual unit, be dropped from <br />the federal reclamation program. If subsequent studies so indicate, <br />a part of the original plan could be incorporated into the Middle <br />Pa~( Project. This possibility, however, is doubtful. <br /> <br />Middle Park project <br /> <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.