Laserfiche WebLink
<br />G02~2~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S MONTHLY REPORT <br />TO THE <br />COLORADO RIVER BOARD OF CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />Februarv 12.2002 <br /> <br />AGENCY MANAGERS MEETING <br /> <br />The Agency Managers held their first meeting in 2002 on January 23'., Discussion topics included: <br />1) revisit of the reimbursement formula for the Six Agency Committee; 2) determination of the acreage <br />on the Palo Verde Mesa entitled to receive Priority 3 water; and 3) eligibility oflands on the Yuma Island <br />to receive Priority 2 water under California's Seven Party Agreement of 193 I, <br /> <br />PROTECTION OF EXISTING RIGHTS <br /> <br />Colorado River Water Reoort <br /> <br />During December 200 I, storage in the major Upper Basin reservoirs decreased by 583,000 acre-feet <br />and storage in the Lower Basin reservoirs increased by 144,000 acre-feet. Total System active storage as <br />oftlle end of December was 45,015 million acre-feet (mat) or 75 percent ofeapacity, which is 4,380 maf <br />less than one year ago, <br /> <br />January releases from Hoover, Davis, and Parker Dams averaged] 1,420,10,800 and 6,380 cubic <br />feet p~; second (cfs), respecti~t;ly. Planned releases from those three dams forthe month of February 2002 <br />are 14,440, 13,870, and 8,280 cfs, respectively. The February releases represent those needed to meet <br />downstream water requirements including those caused by reduced operation of Senator Wash reservoir. <br /> <br />The preliminary February 1,2002, projected April through July 2002 unregulated inflow into Lake <br />Powell was 4,700 maf, which is 59 percent of the 30-year average for the period 196 I -1990 as compared <br />to the actual April through July 2001 runotTwhich was 4,301 mafand 56 percent of the 30-year average <br />for the period 1961-1990. The preliminary February I, 2002, projected unregulated inflow into Lake <br />Powell for the 2001-02 water year was 7.438, or 62 percent ofthe 30-year average, <br /> <br />The Lower Division States' consumptive use of Colorado River water for calendar year 200 I, as <br />calculated by Board staff, totaled 8.] 58 maf and is projected as follows: Arizona, 2.854 maf; California, <br />5,250 maf; and Nevada, 0,304 maf. Estimated additional unmeasured return flow credits of 0,230 maf <br />would reduce the total amount to 7,928 maf, For calendar year 2001, the Central Arizona Project (CAP) <br />diverted 1.519 maf, of which 0,321 mafis to be credited to the Arizona Water Bank, and The Metropolitan <br />Water District of Southern California (MWD) diverted 1.248 maf. <br /> <br />The preliminary actual 2001 end-of-yearCaliforniaagricultural consumptive use of Colorado River <br />water under the first three priorities and the sixth priority of the 193 I California Seven Party Agreement <br />is 3,943 maf. Figure I, found at the end of this report, depicts the historic projected end-of-year <br />