Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OOO~hQ <br /> <br />- 16 - <br /> <br />picture. The mere spectre of change is difficult to accept. This is exacerbated <br />in areas where the change process has not kept pace with the norm. In many of <br />the areas projected to be affected by "boom" growth, population, values and <br />attitudes have undergone little change in the last two decades or more. Residents <br />of these communities have had little or no reason to change during that time <br />and therefore have not done so. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The concept of large numbers of new people, new ideas and eventually <br />a new order is vigorously resisted in the first stages. True, the economic <br />aspects of the growth are generally welcomed and accommodations are made to take <br />advantage of new-found wealth. However, the type of planning and attitude <br />adjustment required to integrate the changing face of the community over the <br />long haul is rarely seen. The prevailing attitude is directed toward short- <br />term economic growth, accompanied by a deep-seated hope that it (change) will <br />all blow over and the community will return to a business as usual mode. <br />Long-range planning and taking the necessary steps to implement those plans <br />are steps which portend an acceptance of the change phenomena. It is possible <br />that the reluctance to change is a primary factor explaining why so little <br />planning is actually done. <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />As new populations arrive and settle, the general state of unpreparedness <br />becomes more and more evident. This, in turn, foments dissatisfaction with <br />the old order. At the point where the dissatisfaction peaks and the population <br />shifts from a majority of old to new, the old guard is relieved and new people <br />begin to take over. Since the attitudes, values and perceptions of the new <br />people differ markedly from those of the old, the change is thrust upon the <br />old residents. Many adapt and integrate back into the new community. Many, <br />however, cannot make the shift. This, combined with economic pressures upon <br />those who are not participating in the economic "boom," has the tendency <br />to further disrupt the social fabric. Alienation, segregation and a variety <br />of other phenomena are able to be noted. The extent to which this occurs <br />proportionately mitigates against the orderly development of the entire <br />community. <br /> <br />Agricultural Impact <br /> <br />Energy development is. already having a substanuial impact <br />on Western Slope agriculture, an impact that has more to do with community <br />stability, changing- -lifestyles and the availability of labor than on the <br />more easily measurable question of the competition for land and water. Each of <br />the three energy production scenarios will accelerate that impact. <br /> <br />It's impossible to quantify the extent to which each scenario will impact <br />agriculture. How, for example, do you possibly predict how many barrels per <br />day of oil shale production will convince a third generation Meeker rancher to <br />sell his ranch? There are, however, some important general principles. Given <br />the three energy production scenarios, the impact on agriculture should be <br />considered as maximum even in the low, status quo case. This transition is <br />already taking place on the Western Slope. These impacts, compounded by other <br />pressures, can do nothing but accelerate. <br /> <br />Direct impacts on land and water cannot be considered as the most crucial <br />yardsticks of impact for our immediate purposes. As an example, less than <br />70,000 acres of land statewide have been disturbed since coal mining began in <br />the 1800's. Energy reSource mapping indicate ~ cropland lies over the state's <br />