My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03159
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03159
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:48:57 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:35:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.911
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies - SE Needs Assessment and PSOP
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
10/1/1999
Author
Montgomery Watson
Title
Draft Report Technical and Environmental Analysis of Storage Alternatives Permitting and Regulatory Issues
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Pennitting k~JJnormallY requiring an EA, but not necessarily an EIS include: <br /> <br />. Regulatory actions: most pennits will normally require only an EA <br />. Authorized projects and projects under construction: changes that may <br />be approved under the discretionary authority of the Secretary of the <br />Army. <br />. Continuing authorities programs Projects recommended for approval if <br />the Chief of Engineers such as the section 205, Small Hood Control <br />Authority. <br />. Construction and Operation Maintenance: Changes and environmental <br />impacts that were not considered in the project authorizing legislation, <br />EIS or EA. Examples are changes in pool level operations, use of new <br />disposal areas, location of bank protection works; etc. <br />. Real Estate Management and Disposal Actions. <br /> <br />Lead Agency <br /> <br />If more than one Federal Agency has pennitting responsibility, as in the case for these <br />alternatives, a lead federal agency is determined. Lead agency status is determined by <br />consultation among potential pennitting agencies and is detennined by the following factors <br />(40 CFR 1501.5): <br /> <br />I. Magnitude of each agencies involvement <br />2. Project approval/disapproval authority; <br />3. Expertise concerning the actions environmental effects; <br />4. Duration of each agency's involvement; <br />5. Sequence of each agency's involvement. <br /> <br />Lead agency status has not been detennined for each of the projects under consideration and, <br />in accordance with the above regulations, will be determined by consultation among the <br />agencies after pennitting activities are initiated. <br /> <br />The following outlines a summary of the Pennitting Issues by agency. <br /> <br />U.S. Bureau of Reclamation <br /> <br />The USBR owns and operates the Fryingpan-Arkansas (Fry-Ark) Project. Pueblo Reservoir <br />enlargement and Turquoise Reservoir enlargement involve physical modification to Fry-Ark <br />facilities, while Reoperations involves modifications to the original allocation principals of <br />the Project. Therefore, the USBR is the likely lead agency for NEPA pennitting. However, <br />this has not formally been decided upon at this time. <br /> <br />The USBR has the same general comments regarding both reoperations of the Project and <br />enlargement of Federal facilities. Enlarged federal facilities will remain federal facilities. <br />However, the role of the USBR in management of the enlarged space will need to be <br /> <br /><m> <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Pennilling and Regulatory Issues <br /> <br />. '. ....... ~".. '.~.._. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.