Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~q'3~ <br />~~~G~ <br /> <br />D. Build Alternative Reservoirs at Different Locations <br /> <br />A number of water projects have been proposed for the north- <br />west corner of Colorado, some of which could furnish water to the <br />beneficiaries of the proposed Taylor Draw Reservoir. Among them <br />are the White River Pumping Pipeline and Reservoir Project, The <br />Oil Shale Corporation Project, the Powell Park Project, the CRWCD <br />Diversion and Storage Project, the Superior Oil Company Diversion <br />and Storage Project, the Wolf Ridge Project, the Boies Project, <br />the Rio Blanco Oil Shale Project, the Cow Creek Project, the Flat <br />Tops Project, the Fourteen Mile Project, the Stillwater Project, <br />the Figure Four Project, and the Yellow Jacket Project, all in the <br />White River drainage basin, and the Cross Mountain Project and the <br />Juniper Project in the Yampa River drainage basin. In addition, <br />there are a number of other future possible diversions, which do <br />not contain water storage provisions in their plans. <br /> <br />The White River projects, except for the Yellow Jacket Project, <br />the Flat Tops Project, and the CRWCD Diversion and Storage Project, <br />are either in the Piceance Creek basin or are concerned with supply- <br />ing water primarily for oil shale development. Many of them will <br />consume most of the water stored and will have very little return <br />flow to the streams. Of the projects named above, the nearest to <br />the Taylor Draw Dam and Reservoir are the White River Project and <br />The Oil Shale Corporation Project, both of which will be using <br />stored waters for development of oil shale. It is not known if <br />either will have water available for uses to be served by Taylor <br />Draw Reservoir or if any or all of the projects listed will ever <br />be constructed. All, in varying de~rees, would help reduce the <br />flood potential at Rangely. <br /> <br />VIII-5 <br />