Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0624 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />, . <br /> <br />Ultimately, the State and the Tribes did agree to <br />hold a negotiating session in Billings, Montana on November 13 <br />and 14, 1984 (the eighth overall meeting). To avoid any <br />possible m~sunderstanding, the Tribes insisted that a written <br />transcript be kept of this and all subsequent meetings. This <br />meeting (and all subsequent negotiations) were attended by <br />representatives of the Governor, Attorney General and State <br />Department of Natural Resources. The Tribes insisted that <br />representatives of these offices be present at all future <br />meetings, because we believed that the State's withdrawal in <br />1983 from negotiations had been caused in large part by these <br />officials and agencies. (Tr. Nov. 13, 1984, pp. 98-100). <br /> <br />The Tribes were represented at the Billings November <br />13 and 14 meeting by Chairman Hollow, Board members Shields and <br />Berner, Mr. Chambers and Mr. Stetson. The Compact CommiRsion <br />Chairman, Mr. McOmber, began the November 13 meeting by <br />apologizing to the Tribes for the breakdown of the negotiations <br />in 1983. He conceded that the Commission had erred by failing <br />to clear the proposed Compact it had agreed to with all state <br />agencies, and said this had caused the breakdown in <br />negotiations. (Tr. Nov. 13, 1984, pp. 3-4). <br /> <br />Chairman Hollow replied that he and the tribal <br />negotiating team had spent a great deal of time on the earlier <br />negotiations. Chairman Hollow stated that the negotiating team <br />had supported the Compact proposed in 1983 because we were <br />convinced that it was in the best interests of the Tribes. The <br />Chairman pointed out that the Commission's abrupt withdrawal <br />from the negotiations had subjected the tribal negotiating teem <br />to unwarranted criticism. Chairman Hollow agreed to continue <br />negotiations, but only on the basis that the essential elements <br />of the earlier agreement favorable to the Tribes would not be <br />reduced in value. Chairman Hollow warned the Commission that <br />the Tribes were also certainly prepared to litigate if the <br />Commission did not make reasonable efforts to resolve the <br />matter. (Tr. Nov. 13, 1984, pp. 7-9). <br /> <br />As the Billings meeting proceeded, the State amended <br />and explained many of its positions, so that it appeared that <br />an agreement along the lines of the concepts agreed to in 1983 <br />might be possible. The negotiating team"agreed to meet with <br />the State again early in 1985, after the Christmas holiday. <br /> <br />.. ) <br />.d <br /> <br />This session, and two others that followed it, were <br />held in Helena, so that state legislative and executive <br />officials could.attend during the 1985 legislative session. <br /> <br />2rn describing some of the Compact provisions in this <br />Report, we will refer to the various transcripts. <br />