My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP03082
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
WSP03082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:42:29 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:32:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8064
Description
Section "D" General Federal Issues/Policies - Indian Water Rights
Date
4/19/1985
Title
Final Report of Tribal Negotiating Team to Fort Peck Tribal Executive Board of Fort Peck-Montana Water Compact
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />O\3-1Q <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />mainstem of the Missouri River from Fort Peck Reservoir or <br />downstream. <br /> <br />This paragraph and paragraph 3 of Section J of <br />Article III provide that diversions from the mainstem of the <br />Missouri River can also be made upstream from Fort Peck <br />Reservoir. These, however, must comply with3~11 state laws, <br />and secure consent of the State legislature. <br /> <br />The Tribes can also authorize persons who have rights <br />under state law to divert and use surface water outside the <br />Reservation from the tributaries other than the Milk River that <br />cross the ~~servation by entering into "deferral agreements" <br />with them. Deferral agreements are somewhat different from <br />water marketing agreements on the mainstem of the Missouri <br />River. Through these deferral agreements, the Tribes could <br />agree to accept compensation for subordinating the Tribes' <br />rights to the person making the diversion for a term of years. <br />No ground water can be diverted for marketing outside the <br />Reservation or be the subject of a deferral agreement. Unlike <br />Missouri River water marketing, the person making the agreement <br />with the Tribes would have to comply with state water laws as <br />well as the terms of the agreement with the Tribes. <br /> <br />Eighth, while diversions from Fort Peck Reservoir or <br />downstream from Fort Peck Dam do not have t~5comply with state <br />regulatory and administrative requir3wents, the Tribes are <br />required by paragraph 1 of Section J to give advance notice <br />to the State showing that, <br /> <br />(1) the off-reservation use of water will be <br />beneficial as defined by valid state law; <br /> <br />33A1so, in the area of the Missouri River above the <br />Reservoir, the Tribes would have to give prior notice to the <br />operators of the nearest dams -- probably either the United <br />States Army Corps of Engineers or the Montana Power Company. <br /> <br />34Article III K(4). <br /> <br />35see, e.g;, Tr. Feb. 28, 1985, pp. 15-16 (remarks of Mr. <br />Roth) . <br /> <br />I <br />..J <br /> <br />36The requirements of this paragraph also apply to <br />diversions from the mainstem of the Missouri River and Fort <br />Peck Reservoir outside the Reservation for use within it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.