Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. '1 <br />\"I; t') ~~, 0 <br />~13.\; -,' Figure 4 displays graphically the intra-regional <br />power transfer arrangement in the WSCC area. The capability <br />data reflects determinations made in November 1976; <br />however, no major new transmission facilities have been <br />added since then, and transfer capabilities have not <br />increased. ~he transfer capabilities shown, of course, <br />may not be obtainable if sufficient generating capability <br />is not available. <br />It is estimated that 900 GWh (equivalent to 1,580,000 <br />BBL oil) per month can be transferred from southern <br />California td nOrthern California over existing transmission <br />facilities. Monthly energy transfer capability from the <br />southern Cali~ornia area to the Oregon-Washington area is <br />estimated to be 800 GWh (1,406,000 BBL oil). It is <br />estimated that existing bulk transmission facilities can <br />transfer 750 aWh of energy from the Wyoming-Utah area to <br />the Oregon-Washington load centers. However, generating <br />capacity limitations may prevent full use of this transfer <br />capability. The Utah Power and Light Company is in the <br />final stages Of construction for Huntington Canyon No. <br />1, a new 415 MW coal-fired unit, and expects Huntington <br />Canyon No.2 (400 MW, coal-fired) to be back in service <br />shortly. Some of the coal-based energy may be available <br />to the drought areas. <br /> <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />j'.,,'"i;~~~ <br />;~,:~i~!~ <br />""'t"YJ.~ <br /> <br />..*~ ' , <br />~~i ./-, <br /> <br />'< " - .,:;,;i _i-:.~ ,_,__ ~ , <br />