Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />w <br />lJl <br />Z <br />W <br />(L <br />x <br />w <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />z <br />w <br />:i: <br />Z <br />cr <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-.? <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />Q <br />w <br />o <br />:J <br />o <br />o <br />cr <br />(L <br />w <br />cr <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />(':) <br />r::) <br />~ <br />c...., <br />~ <br />00 <br /> <br />Corps of Engineers <br />Revised July 1984 <br /> <br />ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN ABOVE KEYSTONE DAM <br /> <br />9, Winfield Local Protection Modification, KS <br />STATUS: This project was authorized in 1965 and a Phase I General Design <br />Memorandum (GDM) was completed in January 1976. The GDM recommended suspension <br />of preconstruction planning studies because the benefit-to-cost was less than unity. <br />Accordingly, the project was placed on "inactive" status on 18 January 1977. <br />Estimated benefits in the GDM were based on regulated flows anticipated with three <br />upstream Corps projects (El Dorado, Towanda, and Douglass) and the upstream Soil <br />Conservation Service system of structures in place. Recent planning efforts have <br />shown that Towanda Lake is not justified. Also, it is unlikely that Douglass <br />will be constructed in the near future. Without these reservoir projects, flooding <br />of Winfield would be increased, thus increasing flood control benefits which would <br />accrue to the Winfield project. New studies based on the change in assumed flow <br />conditions, basic data update, and current study criteria could show a favorable <br />benefit-to-cost ratio. By letter dated 31 January 1980, and in a visit to Tulsa <br />District on 14 April, the City Manager of Winfield requested the Corps to reactivate <br />planning studies. As a result of those visits, approval was obtained on 24 May <br />1982 to transfer the project from the "inactive" status to the "deferred" status. <br />The city is actively pursuing funds to upgrade their levee. <br /> <br />DESCRIPTION: The authorized plan consists of raising most of the existing levee <br />which is 14,500 feet long, to provide 1 foot of freeboard above the standard <br />project flood modified by upstream reservoirs. Also the levee would be extended <br />about 950 feet along Timber Creek on the north and about 7,600 feet along the <br />Walnut River on the south. The levee would have a crown width of 10 feet and <br />side slopes of 1 foot vertical to 3 feet horizontal. Interior drainage would be <br />provided by a 72-inch gated pipe and by a ponding area. <br /> <br />SPONSOR: City of Winfield, KS. <br /> <br />29, Arkansas River from Great Bend, KS, to John Martin Dam, CO <br />STATUS: The current efforts are being directed toward investigating non-structural <br />and structural solutions to flood problems at communities along the main stem <br />Arkansas River. Also, water supply studies at Lamar, Colorado and multipurpose <br />channelization studies for the Arkansas River are underway as is a hydropower <br />study at John Martin Reservoir. The study has resulted in three completed 205 <br />projects at Holley and Granada, Colorado, and Larned, Kansas; and a project con- <br />struction authorization for Great Bend, Kansas. Two additional Section 205 projects <br />have been developed at Kinsley and Wilroads Gardens, Kansas; but local interests <br />are unable to provide satisfactory assurances. A reconnaissance study was <br />initiated in FY82 for the main stem Arkansas River downstream of John Martin Dam, <br />Colorado to the Colorado-Kansas State line. An economically feasible plan has not <br />been recommended at this time, therefore, flood control studies have been discon- <br />tinued. A hydropower study for John Martin Dam was initiated in FY 1982 and <br />scheduled for completion in FY 1984. <br /> <br />DESCRIPTION: The survey-scope study is investigating problems and needs <br />of the basin to determine the economic, engineering, and environmental <br />feasibility of water resource development. The study scope includes <br />determination of the feasibility of flood control measures hydropower <br />irrigatio~, municipal and industrial water supply, fish 'and wildlif~ <br />conservatlon, and enhancement, and recreation. <br /> <br />SPONSOR: Great Bend Local Protection sponsor the city of Great Bend. <br />Lamar County Water Supply sponsor the city of Lamar. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />c <br />