My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02944
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02944
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:47:48 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:27:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.750
Description
San Juan River General
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
1/1/1959
Author
Unknown
Title
San Juan Engineering Committee - 1958-1959 - Report of the San Juan Engineering Committee - January 1959
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />000220 <br /> <br />the Navajo River column of Table 6, actually it was not contemplated <br /> <br /> <br />that the water designated "available for Dulce Project", in an aver- <br /> <br /> <br />age amount of 35,000 acre feet, would be released to the Navajo River <br /> <br /> <br />in the event that the Dulce Project would be eventually constructed, <br /> <br />~, <br />} <br /> <br /><< <br />t <br /> <br />In that case it would be stored in a proposed reservoir and released <br />through a canal to Dulce Project lands, Under this operation study, <br />for the period 1928-1951, an average of about 23,000 acre feet annually <br />of Navajo River water would be available for diversion to the Rio <br />Grande. <br /> <br />The Bureau of Reclamation operation study for the 1957 <br /> <br />supplemental report indicates that the Dulce Project was no longer <br /> <br /> <br />considered. The potential diversion from the Navajo River was esti.- <br /> <br /> <br />mated,to average about 57,000 acre feet. This would leave average <br /> <br /> <br />flows in the Navajo River amounting to only the prior right by-passes <br /> <br />as shown above, <br /> <br />The monthly releases are somewhat less than the recommended <br /> <br />minimums of Table 11. However, these minimums are in some cases <br /> <br />higher than historic flows. It should be noted that water by-passed <br /> <br />for prior irrigation rights is subject to diversion and re-diversion <br /> <br />which could result in stream flows at critical points considerably <br /> <br /> <br />below the recommended minimums for retaining the fishery values of <br /> <br /> <br />the stream. This situation would tend to discount statements made by <br /> <br /> <br />the Fish and Wildlife Service as to the general adequacy of the aver- <br /> <br />age by-passes to meet recommended minimums. <br /> <br />This conflict of reported data raises a serious question <br />concerning the intent of the operation of the project after construction.' <br /> <br />~15- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.