Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CROSS SECTION OF THE CLOSED BASIN PROJECT <br /> <br />(v:> <br />-:") <br />00 <br />....... <br />c.:; <br />'.:) <br /> <br />PROJECT <br />BOUNDARY <br /> <br />PLAN VIEW <br /> <br />PROJECT <br />BOUNDARY <br /> <br />OBSERVATION <br />WELL <br /> <br />CONVEYANCE CHANNEL <br /> <br />~e~~Te I SALVAGE <br />CONTROL SYSTEM __ WELL <br /> <br />WELL VAULT <br /> <br />~PAE"IlOJECT 7 <br />GAOUNOW"TER LEVEL <br /> <br />UNCONFINED AOUIFER <br /> <br />SALVAGE WELL VAULT-- <br />, <br />"- <br />" <br />~ <br />DRAW OOWN SURFACE - \ <br />\ <br /> <br />SUBMERSIBLE PUMP <br /> <br />WELL SCREEN <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />fLEe POWER <br />.'" <br /> <br />2'MAXlMUM <br /> <br />PRESSURE <br />.."'" <br /> <br />SUAFACECASING <br />EMENT GROUT <br />DRAW DOWN <br />SURFACE <br /> <br />/ <br />I WEll IN <br />UNCONFINED <br />AQUIFER- <br /> <br />g CONFiNiNGLAYEFlANDl.ENSES ~G..:i -'~ <br />r ~,~~~ ~ <br /> <br />ARTESIAN LEAKAGE <br /> <br />CONFINEO AOUIFER <br /> <br />Salvage wells In the Bureau of Reclamation's Closed <br />Basin Project take water out of the San Luis Valley's <br />low.lylng sump. All of It's producing wells are In the <br /> <br />SAN LUIS VALLEY WATER <br />continued from page 11 <br /> <br />tion. The amended application fIXes <br />that, he says. <br />"We have said from day one that we <br />are not going to go ahead unless there is <br />a massive supply of water there. We <br />think the study by the U.S. Geological <br />Survey, and our own study, shows that <br />there's a lot of water in the aquifer and <br />that there is a massive supply. But, we <br />have to prove that. <br />"Secondly, we've said that whatever <br />we did in regard to developing water... <br />would not harm the San Luis Valley. <br />"And, thirdly whatever we did would <br />create benefits in the San Luis Valley," <br />Schaffer concluded. <br />"The first two operating principles <br />are answered in the technical amend- <br />ment we made to our application on <br />Aug. 20," says Schaffer. <br />The record shows that A WDI did not <br />choose to amend its original application <br />until it became clear it would have to <br />plead its water claim under Colorado <br />water law. In July, the company lost its <br />court case asking for outright ownership <br />of the water underlying the Baca Ranch. <br />A WDI based that claim on its belief <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />c <br /> <br />WELL IN <br />CONFINED <br />AQUIFER <br /> <br />Bureau of Reclamation Map <br /> <br />shallow unconfined aquifer. There are observation <br />wells In the confined aquifer to make sure the project <br />does no harm. Salvage water goes to the Rio Grande. <br /> <br />that the Baca Ranch, officially known <br />as the Luis Maria Cabeza de Baca Grant <br />No.4, is_ a valid Spanish or Mexi- <br />can land grant and faIls under the juris- <br />diction of Spanish and / or Mexican <br />law. <br />A WDI claimed, as one of four parts <br />of its original application, that the Baca <br />was exempt from U.S. or Colorado <br />water law and should be allowed to <br />claim the water outright under the rules <br />of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of <br />1848 or the Act of 1860. (The Treaty of <br />Guadalupe Hidalgo protected the rights <br />of Mexican citizens who owned lands <br />ceded to the U.S. at the close of the <br />Mexican-American War.) <br />District 3 Water Court Judge Robert <br />W. Ogburn denied the Spanish land <br />grant claim on July 5 reportedly ~eIling <br />A WDl's lawyers their case reminded <br />him of the old adage: "When one has <br />the facts, argue the facts. When one has <br />the law, argue the law. When one has <br />neither, just argue." <br />In its amended application, A WDl is <br />applying under Colorado water law for <br />non-tributary, or alternatively tributary <br />groundwater. Prepared by the Denver <br />water law firm of Saunders, Snyder, <br />Ross and Dickson, which represents <br /> <br />','p <br /> <br />A WDI, the amended application also <br />sets out measures for an augmentation <br />plan to the Valley's water system in the <br />event of any damages to irrigators or to <br />the Bureau of Reclamation's Closed Ba- <br />sin Project, which is being completed <br />near the Baca. <br />In its amended application, A WDI <br />has also reserved its rillht to appeal its <br />Spanish land grant water claim, says <br />David Robbins, of Hill and Robbins, <br />the attorney for those agencies in the <br />Valley who have banded together as the <br />"joint objectors." Water court appeals <br />go directly to the Colorado Supreme <br />Court. <br />"They got spanked hard on that deal <br />(the Spanish claim)," says Valley farm- <br />er Greg Gosar. Gosar heads the: Citizens <br />for San Luis VaIley Water, a group that <br />hop~s to head off A WDl-and any fu- <br />ture water marketers-by increasing <br />public awareness and education about <br />the Valley's existing, water-based <br />economy. <br />That group is financed in part by the <br />sale of hats, T-shirts and bumperstick- <br />ers that bear a circle with a slash Over the <br />letters "A WDI." Those items were <br />popular attire this summer in the VaIley. <br />Costumed protesters and floats <br /> <br />} <br />T <br />} <br />, <br /> <br />c <br />. <br />. <br />~ <br />I. <br />o <br />. <br />Ir <br />3 <br />F <br />G <br />L <br />2 <br />" <br />V <br />e <br />, <br />S <br />e" <br />e <br />s' <br />}" <br />1 <br />P <br /> <br />Colorado Rancher & Farmer <br /> <br />c <br />