My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02904
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02904
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:47:36 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:26:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.16
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/11/1989
Author
Western Area Power A
Title
Comparison of Actual vs. Estimated Impacts to Purchase Power Expenses With October Special Releases at Glen Canyon
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Change in Operations At Other CRSP Powerplants -- In the <br />initial estimate, it was assumed that foregone generation at Glen <br />Canyon would be supplemented with purchases, only. However, <br />in actuality, reduced generation at Glen Canyon was <br />accommodated somewhat by increased generation at other CRSP <br />powerplants (Flaming Gorge & Curecanti Unit). <br /> <br />Reduced Loads -- The pattern of load assumed in the initial <br />projections was overestimated, and therefore the need for <br />purchase power was assumed greater than what actually <br />occurred. <br /> <br />Though the actual expenses incurred were less than originally <br />estimated, the $64,000 additional expense resulted in a period <br />representing roughly 1 percent of the total hours in the year and <br />during a period of projected dry hydrologic conditions within the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />Though interchange was used to reduce purchase power expenses, <br />the availability of interchange can not be assumed over an extended <br />period during future months, particularly in future peak load <br />months. <br /> <br />Our conclusion is that any future special releases at Glen Canyon <br />(and any other CRSP facility) which substantially deviate from <br />normal operations should be prudently evaluated and the potential <br />costs of such temporary changes considered. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.