My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP02904
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
2001-3000
>
WSP02904
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:47:36 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 11:26:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.16
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/11/1989
Author
Western Area Power A
Title
Comparison of Actual vs. Estimated Impacts to Purchase Power Expenses With October Special Releases at Glen Canyon
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />wA-f>A L <br /> <br />Western Area Power Administration <br />Salt Lake City Area <br /> <br />COMPARISON OF ACTUAL VS. ESTIMATED <br />IMPACTS TO PURCHASE POWER EXPENSES <br />WITH OCTOBER SPECIAL RELEASES <br />AT GLEN CANYON <br /> <br />November 11, 1989 <br /> <br />Estimates of actual additional expenses incurred as a result of the <br />5,000 cfs constant release at Glen Canyon for the period from <br />October 6 through October 9,1989 are summarized in the attached <br />Table 1. Based upon the analysis of actual power system operations <br />during this period, Western conlcudes that an additional expense of <br />$64,000 was incurred for this 4-day period. <br /> <br />An earlier estimates of expenses for this period of special release <br />which was prepared in August, was estimated to be $92,000. This <br />projected expense is summarized in the attached Table 2. <br /> <br />Actual expenses differ from those estimated in August because of the <br />following reasons: <br /> <br />Use of Interchange -- Expenses were reduced since receipt of <br />interchange energy reduced the total purchase power <br />requirements. This interchange was comprised of intra project <br />interchange of approximately 9.2 gWh and interutility <br />interchange of 8.7 gWh. If this interchange had not occurred, the <br />on-peak premium price would have been 28 mills per kWh rather <br />than 21.5 m/kWh. With this higher on-peak purchase rate, <br />expenses could have been as high as $171,500. See Table 3, <br />attached. <br /> <br />Lower Actual Purchase Rates -- Purchase prices both onpeak and <br />offpeak were lower than initially estimated, which resulted in <br />lower net expenses for each day in the 4-day period, with <br />significantly lower expenses on Sunday. <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.