WSP02891 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

amendments suggested in the report - restrict- ions on all groundwater transfers not to exceed a certain distance or quantity - should be consid- ered. Alternative #8. Seek funding for additional water retention structu res. In view of current efforts and general policy statements which have been made regarding surface water storage, the Commission recom- mends implementation of this alternative as one method of making more water available for bene- ficia/ use across the state. Since our intent is to conserve and preserve our water by putting it to beneficial use within the state, this alternative would be one step toward an overall goal of maximum water utilization. Alternative # 11: Enact a statute requiring that persons compiy with an out-of-state law as a condition for receiving a Nebraska permit to conduct seeding activities in Nebraska de- signed to have an impact out-of-state. We recommend the adoption of this alternative for reasons of interstate courtesy and friendship and to encourage the mutual recognition of offi- cial state acts. While this alternative does not benefit Nebraska directly, it will aid those states having weather modification laws which could be circumvented by carrying out the activities in an upwind state which has no law forbidding them. It is one more way of cooperating with neighboring states without apparent detriment to Nebraska. ALTERNATIVES NOT RECOMMENDED The following alternatives are not recommend- ed by the Commission: Alternative # 1 (Make no change) was rejected because the Commission felt, in light of certain current events, some changes were needed. Alternative #3 (Negotiation of interstate groundwater compacts) is not recommended at this time because not enough precise informa- tion is available upon which to base any kind of apportionment. Alternative # 5 (Provide that certain uses of water not be considered beneficial uses) was rejected because the Commission believes that "benefi- cial" use should refer to the nonwasteful and efficiency elements of water use rather than particular types of use. Furthermore, we feel the state poiicy should be to promote the most beneficial use of water. For this reason, we suggest waiting for the completion of the Policy Issue Study on Water Use Efficiency before making any definite recommendations on what types of water use mayor may not be beneficial uses. Alternative # 7 (Provide for reservation of waters by the Department of Water Resources to fulfill public interest requirements) is not recom- mended. While a concept of reserving future streamflows has substantial merit from the standpoint of interstate water use and conflicts, it is viewed as having a comparatively small impact within the state of Nebraska itself. The idea could create potentially more discontent internally among water users than it could dispel byestab- lishing a favorable posture for future interstate water allocations. The Report on Preferences in the Use of Water attempted to recognize such reservations for preferred water uses; however the Municipal Wafer Needs Policy Issue Study found very little application to municipalities for a similar alternative. Therefore, we have decided to reject this alternative at the present time. Alternative #9 (Authorize a state agency to buy water rights in another state) is also not recom- mended. The Commission is of the opinion that if Nebraska wants the right to purchase water rights in other states, it would have to grant similar rights to other states to purchase water rights in Nebraska. We do not want other states to be able to buy Nebraska water. Alternative # 1 0 (Allow a state agency to partici- pate in construction of water projects in other states) was rejected for the reason that the opportunity to participate in out-of-state water projects will come up so infrequently and will present such specialized problems that the Leg- islature will need to give each project individual attention. Alternative # 12 (Negotiation of an interstate weather modification compact) is not recom- mended at this time. The existing "science" of weather modification is not very precise and the lack of interest indicated by the cancellation of the Po/icy Issue Study on Weather Modification make the pursuit of an interstate weather modifi- cation compact inappropriate. II