Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8 <br /> <br />The map, Figure 10, of Public Service Company's system show the <br />points, as circles, where preference customers are now receiving Bureau <br />power under present wheeling arrangements. <br /> <br />planned transmission additions to the Company system, Figure 11, <br />will further implement our ability to wheel Bureau power to preference <br />customers. <br /> <br />The yardstick system here in Colorado will deliver project power <br />only to the load centers shown on Figure 12 as triangles, and not to those <br />shown by the circles. Obviously, a large amount of additional construction <br />would be necessary to fill the gap between the triangles and the circles. <br />This would amount to some 430 miles of lines. <br /> <br />The combination system would prevent wasteful duplication of <br />transmission circuits, Some of the transmission lines useful in trans- <br />porting project power are already in service and many more transmission <br />facilities that would be used in part for this service are either under <br />construction or authorized. In Colorado, facilities already exist be- <br />tween Poncha and Pueblo that can transport project power. The building <br />of Federal lines along this same route would needlessly duplicate investor- <br />owned lines and waste some $14 million dollars of taxpayers' money. <br /> <br />The investor-owned utilities realizing that two different yard- <br />sticks had been used, agreed to meet with the Bureau of Reclamation and <br />discuss their report, and at the March 13 and 14 meeting with the Bureau <br />of Reclamation the investor-owned utilities advised the Bureau of the many <br />inconsistencies in their report. In spite of these discussions, we were <br />told that they would not consider changing this analysis. A subsequent <br />news report attributed to the Bureau confirmed their position. <br /> <br />Except for this news coverage we have had no further word from <br />the Bureau or any offer by them to try to resolve these differences. <br /> <br />The issues involved have been complicated by considerable mis- <br />information. Representatives of the preference groups in the area have <br />made public statements concerning this controversy which cannot be sub- <br />stantiated. <br /> <br />The following is a quote appearing in Denver Post on April 2, <br />1961 attributed to Mr. Howard Scott, Secretary of Colorado River Basin <br />Consumers Power Inc.} a five-state preference group. <br /> <br />"Obviol!sly, the utilities plan an all-out fight to extract a <br />private profH from public development, but this will be met <br />by cold facts and figures which show an adverse effect On <br />project development, on the basin account, and on power bills <br />of the ultimate consumer." <br /> <br />These "cold facts and figures" are based on the comp;irison of <br />a 36-inch yardstick against a 24-inch yardstick - an arithmetical fallacy <br />and as such are not "facts" either hot or cold. <br />